Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Ephemera and Photographs
>
Won't You Join Me On My Fool's Errand?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Jivvy, post: 389569, member: 8184"][USER=2844]@Any Jewelry[/USER] I've gone pretty deep into this side of the family, if they were cousins, I'm pretty sure I would know...though it is exactly the kind of thing I would expect them to try to hide from me.</p><p><br /></p><p>Honestly, there's always something that twists every tiny bit of info to where you just can't trust it -- it's as if they planned it. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie51" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>And we don't know that they look alike. If the pictures I posted are all of Lottie02... -- wait, let me address that.</p><p><br /></p><p>Having mulled and listened to you guys, I really do think the pictures are all of Lottie02. Not just for the reason [USER=5833]@Bronwen[/USER] gave (which I liked), but because it makes sense of "B" and the children who are in the full version. If photo "B" was Lottie01 (photo "B" was always the one I questioned), then there should be an additional child in the picture. It makes more sense for it to be Lottie02.</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm honestly not sure this will ever be solved. Or at least not in my lifetime. Which means probably ever, because I'm fairly certain no one else (other than the lovely [USER=59]@Bakersgma[/USER] ) is researching this. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=";)" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]135100[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Jivvy, post: 389569, member: 8184"][USER=2844]@Any Jewelry[/USER] I've gone pretty deep into this side of the family, if they were cousins, I'm pretty sure I would know...though it is exactly the kind of thing I would expect them to try to hide from me. Honestly, there's always something that twists every tiny bit of info to where you just can't trust it -- it's as if they planned it. :hilarious: And we don't know that they look alike. If the pictures I posted are all of Lottie02... -- wait, let me address that. Having mulled and listened to you guys, I really do think the pictures are all of Lottie02. Not just for the reason [USER=5833]@Bronwen[/USER] gave (which I liked), but because it makes sense of "B" and the children who are in the full version. If photo "B" was Lottie01 (photo "B" was always the one I questioned), then there should be an additional child in the picture. It makes more sense for it to be Lottie02. I'm honestly not sure this will ever be solved. Or at least not in my lifetime. Which means probably ever, because I'm fairly certain no one else (other than the lovely [USER=59]@Bakersgma[/USER] ) is researching this. ;) [ATTACH=full]135100[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Ephemera and Photographs
>
Won't You Join Me On My Fool's Errand?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...