Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Joan, post: 542162, member: 5398&quot;]I have a small collection of signed Miriam Haskell jewelry plus several pieces that I&#039;ve been trying to determine if they&#039;re unsigned Haskell. I have the Cathy Gordon &amp; Sheila Pamfiloff 2009 <i>Miriam Haskell Jewelry</i> book, and have also searched &quot;Haskell&quot; on this site and have looked at thousands of pictures of signed and &quot;unsigned&quot; Haskell jewelry on other websites, but haven&#039;t been able to find examples exactly like some of my pieces. I would appreciate any opinions on whether the following pieces are unsigned Miriam Haskell jewelry.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]168769[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]168770[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]168771[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]168772[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>According to Cathy Gordon, the spring-ring clasps with a small band/lip on the opening (like those shown in the above photos) were used on most Haskell jewelry that didn&#039;t use the hook/tail fastener. However, I have a necklace with the Haskell hang tag that has a spring-ring clasp that does have the extended metal piece as shown in the photo below. [ATTACH=full]168767[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>So, I&#039;m thinking the baroque pearl, coral, and glass bead necklace shown below might be unsigned Haskell.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]168768[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m also wondering about this brooch. The beads are wrapped with what looks like silk fibers. The back is pierced celluloid.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]168782[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]168783[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Has anyone seen similar examples of any of these jewelry pieces, or have opinions on whether any could be considered unsigned Miriam Haskell jewelry?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in