Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;*crs*, post: 38749, member: 196&quot;]I agree that the number appears to be 7064 and if I understand the Rd numbers correctly then <b>1884</b>=1 (thru 19755?)...<b>1885</b>=19756, this number would be 1884 as I previously mentioned.</p><p><a href="http://www.thepotteries.org/mark/reg.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.thepotteries.org/mark/reg.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepotteries.org/mark/reg.htm</a></p><p>What evelb30 says makes sense in that some potters where still used to using the diamond mark. As far as the backstamp goes, I don&#039;t think it is a globe with a crown. Definitely a circle or double circle with a crown. As mentioned I can see lettering around the inner edge of the circle but just can&#039;t read any of them. Also, there is definitely a word going across the middle of the circle like the John Maddock &amp; Sons mark. Looking in Kovels I see a couple of other marks that it could be such as J.Fryer &amp; Sons, W.&amp;E. Corn(doubtful) &amp; Birks, Rawlins &amp; Co.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in