Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;moreotherstuff, post: 4756846, member: 56&quot;]Laid paper would be most likely, but wove paper had been introduced by then, and it caught on pretty quickly.</p><p><br /></p><p>With all the titles consistent with the British Museum example, you&#039;re probably okay.</p><p><br /></p><p>Just as a side comment: I think it&#039;s a bit unusual having the arms overlap the image as they do here.&nbsp; The arms and lettering under a print were often done by third party specialists.</p><p><br /></p><p>I found several examples online, none of which looked any different from yours.</p><p><br /></p><p>This example gives dimensions:</p><p><a href="https://philamuseum.org/collection/object/735" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://philamuseum.org/collection/object/735" rel="nofollow">https://philamuseum.org/collection/object/735</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s one that sold (unframed) for 60€:</p><p><a href="https://www.catawiki.com/de/l/28513371-jacques-firmin-beauvarlet-1731-1797-after-jean-marc-nattier-1685-1766-le-chaste-joseph" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.catawiki.com/de/l/28513371-jacques-firmin-beauvarlet-1731-1797-after-jean-marc-nattier-1685-1766-le-chaste-joseph" rel="nofollow">https://www.catawiki.com/de/l/28513371-jacques-firmin-beauvarlet-1731-1797-after-jean-marc-nattier-1685-1766-le-chaste-joseph</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I didn&#039;t find any that specified the type of paper (except for one that said &quot;thick&quot;).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in