Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
The cost of framing
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="verybrad, post: 9546313, member: 37"]Me too. It is ironic that you can buy original art so cheaply and the framing costs an arm and a leg. I bought the above litho directly from the artist on ebay at a fire-sale price. It is an artist's proof he has had laying around since 1989 when he created it. I am glad it didn't cost any more than it did to frame it. I will keep it for now but I am sure it will be for sale at some point. Have to take the overall cost into account when selling if I want to make a profit. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The buying public is pretty fickle, doesn't have much vision beyond what is presented, and don't want to take any responsibility for creating something that fits their vision. For this reason, the trend is for artists to gallery wrap their paintings so that it doesn't have to be framed to be shown. The problem with this is that once bought, it generally still never gets framed.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>It was framed to my taste but I get what you are saying. I originally envisioned a lighter grey mat but the ones that were available were either too light or the wrong hue. The mat I ultimately chose is charcoal so there is some contrast with the black frame liner and the black in the print, even if it doesn't show well in the photo. You will also note that the mat core is white so also sets off the print. I considered painting the entire frame black but like the vintage white-washed look of the oak. Hard to tell in the photo that it is white-washed but it is. Had the print background been more sepia-toned, my choices would probably have been different.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="verybrad, post: 9546313, member: 37"]Me too. It is ironic that you can buy original art so cheaply and the framing costs an arm and a leg. I bought the above litho directly from the artist on ebay at a fire-sale price. It is an artist's proof he has had laying around since 1989 when he created it. I am glad it didn't cost any more than it did to frame it. I will keep it for now but I am sure it will be for sale at some point. Have to take the overall cost into account when selling if I want to make a profit. The buying public is pretty fickle, doesn't have much vision beyond what is presented, and don't want to take any responsibility for creating something that fits their vision. For this reason, the trend is for artists to gallery wrap their paintings so that it doesn't have to be framed to be shown. The problem with this is that once bought, it generally still never gets framed. It was framed to my taste but I get what you are saying. I originally envisioned a lighter grey mat but the ones that were available were either too light or the wrong hue. The mat I ultimately chose is charcoal so there is some contrast with the black frame liner and the black in the print, even if it doesn't show well in the photo. You will also note that the mat core is white so also sets off the print. I considered painting the entire frame black but like the vintage white-washed look of the oak. Hard to tell in the photo that it is white-washed but it is. Had the print background been more sepia-toned, my choices would probably have been different.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
The cost of framing
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...