Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Figtree3, post: 29146, member: 33&quot;]In another thread I said that scanned copies of photographs are generally better for editing and viewing details than photographed copies are.</p><p><br /></p><p>At least, I think they are... here is an experimental comparison, using a faded cabinet photo from my collection.</p><p><br /></p><p>These have been cropped, and somewhat sharpened. The same edit was done on all. Maybe others will not see the difference that I do... but we&#039;ll see.</p><p><br /></p><p>Scanned:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]7249[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Photographed:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]7250[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>And another photograph that turned out more at an angle:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]7251[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The photographed ones were taken under incandescent light with no flash, and that does make a difference in the darkness of the photo. I didn&#039;t have a handy way to take under flourescent.</p><p><br /></p><p>See the differences? I think the scanned one is clearer.</p><p><br /></p><p>Fig[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in