Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Dawnno, post: 647995, member: 10171&quot;]Thanks, [USER=5006]@kyratango[/USER]. As a &#039;general rule&#039; I find that kind of comparative post is SO important and helpful, so, particularly when a novice in this area like me sees the differences in &#039;aesthetics&#039;, as opposed to form, content, methods, etc., it just &#039;pops out&#039; how important the experiential factor is when dealing with an object, especially one being assessed &#039;in a vacuum&#039;.&nbsp;&nbsp; There is just NO comparison in the beauty of the originals with the repros... and that is usually true in every field, so we all fall prey to forgetting to assess the object in the context of the originals.&nbsp; Side by side if necessary.&nbsp;&nbsp; thx.</p><p><br /></p><p>(And that&#039;s why we can get fooled.&nbsp; vanity or excitement takes over.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in