Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;say_it_slowly, post: 2274061, member: 50&quot;]In the event anyone stumbles upon this article calling these vases Harker, though they don&#039;t show the mark, I tried to look into it. No idea where he got the info but sounded like he knew something.</p><p><a href="https://www.ocala.com/news/20110212/pity-but-pate-sur-pate-not-an-original/1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.ocala.com/news/20110212/pity-but-pate-sur-pate-not-an-original/1" rel="nofollow">https://www.ocala.com/news/20110212/pity-but-pate-sur-pate-not-an-original/1</a></p><p>[ATTACH=full]257330[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I have virtually no knowledge of Harker but did look in Lehner&#039;s book of marks for some info and did a cursory look online. Harker did make a dinnerware line called Pate Sur Pate but it doesn&#039;t resemble the vases and used a different mark as far as I can see. The sand blast method he describes in the article matches Lehner&#039;s description of the way Harker&#039;s Cameoware was produced but again, doesn&#039;t resemble the vase and used a different mark. I didn&#039;t see any Harker marks that were anywhere close to the mark we&#039;ve been looking for. Someone else may have more information.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]257329[/ATTACH]</p><p><a href="https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/vintage-harker-pottery-co-teapot-gray-500055246" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/vintage-harker-pottery-co-teapot-gray-500055246" rel="nofollow">https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/vintage-harker-pottery-co-teapot-gray-500055246</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in