Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Any Jewelry, post: 1413876, member: 2844&quot;]One does.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie75" alt=":playful:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>And yet many of them didn&#039;t seem to reject those, Millais for instance. The big culprit was Rosetti, although he did some beautiful paintings of his wife. Hunt seemed to try but didn&#039;t always succeed. I still think it was a personal thing, not stylistic.</p><p>Portraying the models as more ugly than they actually were has nothing to do with not complying with conventional standards of beauty imo. As many Pre-Raphaelite paintings showed, including the Tudor-esque girl you posted before.</p><p>Did they use stauesque women as models, as opposed to dainty girls? Yes, they often did. But those women weren&#039;t ugly. They were made ugly in certain paintings.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in