Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
New game: Yea or Nay?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="verybrad, post: 9844340, member: 37"]Sorry it took me so long to get back to this. Will wrap pair #10 up with a few comments. As indicated above, I chose these two works due to their chaotic nature. While on the surface, dissimilar, both works are dynamic in their execution. Neither are literal in subject matter but are recocognizeable. Consequently, while seemingly abstract at first glance, neither would be considered abstract.</p><p><br /></p><p>#10A is by listed NC artist Pat Bowers (b. 1937). There is a small body of work documented for her and most sell in the low to mid hundreds of dollars. This particular work is mixed media on card stock or illustration board. It appears to be watercolor and guoache, or possibly acrylic. It is varnished. Based on the style and framing, I would place this to the 60s or so.</p><p><br /></p><p>I picked this up at a local thrift store and probably paid less than $10.00 for it. I have owned it a number of years and have offered it for sale locally on at least 3 occasions. Each time it was offered in the $200.00 range but there was apparently no interest. I personally like this work and have occasionally displayed it at home. It is not currently on display.</p><p><br /></p><p>#10B is signed Brian Bruson, as near as I can make out. I have not been able to attribute this to any known artist and suspect it is a talented student's work. It is acrylic on plywood and intended to be displayed unframed. I doubt if this is older than 50 years, and probably considerably newer. The style is vibrant and impressionistic as far as the background goes. The painting is more literal when it comes to the execution of the dragonfly, though there is a fleeting ephemeral sense to it. The painting becomes even more literal with the portion of a lizard seen at the top of the painting and the inclusion of the words, <i>fly dragon fly</i>.</p><p><br /></p><p>This painting was given to me as a gift from a friend. I was with this friend in a local shop and happened to admire the painting. A week later, she showed up with the painting at my house. I believe the painting was priced $65.00 at the shop and suspect she was able to buy it for less. I like this painting and display it at home. I do not particularly like the more literal aspects of it and find the inclusion of the words distracting and unecessary. Overall, I think the painting well executed. There is a certain sense of freedom to the style and the use of color is wonderful. I wish I could paint like this.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="verybrad, post: 9844340, member: 37"]Sorry it took me so long to get back to this. Will wrap pair #10 up with a few comments. As indicated above, I chose these two works due to their chaotic nature. While on the surface, dissimilar, both works are dynamic in their execution. Neither are literal in subject matter but are recocognizeable. Consequently, while seemingly abstract at first glance, neither would be considered abstract. #10A is by listed NC artist Pat Bowers (b. 1937). There is a small body of work documented for her and most sell in the low to mid hundreds of dollars. This particular work is mixed media on card stock or illustration board. It appears to be watercolor and guoache, or possibly acrylic. It is varnished. Based on the style and framing, I would place this to the 60s or so. I picked this up at a local thrift store and probably paid less than $10.00 for it. I have owned it a number of years and have offered it for sale locally on at least 3 occasions. Each time it was offered in the $200.00 range but there was apparently no interest. I personally like this work and have occasionally displayed it at home. It is not currently on display. #10B is signed Brian Bruson, as near as I can make out. I have not been able to attribute this to any known artist and suspect it is a talented student's work. It is acrylic on plywood and intended to be displayed unframed. I doubt if this is older than 50 years, and probably considerably newer. The style is vibrant and impressionistic as far as the background goes. The painting is more literal when it comes to the execution of the dragonfly, though there is a fleeting ephemeral sense to it. The painting becomes even more literal with the portion of a lizard seen at the top of the painting and the inclusion of the words, [I]fly dragon fly[/I]. This painting was given to me as a gift from a friend. I was with this friend in a local shop and happened to admire the painting. A week later, she showed up with the painting at my house. I believe the painting was priced $65.00 at the shop and suspect she was able to buy it for less. I like this painting and display it at home. I do not particularly like the more literal aspects of it and find the inclusion of the words distracting and unecessary. Overall, I think the painting well executed. There is a certain sense of freedom to the style and the use of color is wonderful. I wish I could paint like this.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
New game: Yea or Nay?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...