Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
New game: Yea or Nay?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="verybrad, post: 9818342, member: 37"]Guess I will wrap this pair up. I chose them since they were both seascapes with trees and very different in style. Ironically, I can't think these were painted more than a decade apart from each other. </p><p><br /></p><p>Painting A is, indeed, a CA seascape. It is signed D.S. Beech and dated 1961. I was never able to attribute this to a particular person. I am sure the frame is original, as it is so in keeping with the timeframe. I picked this from a thrift store and think I paid $7.00 for it. It has a modernist sensibility to it and exhibits some pallete knife work which doesn't really show in the photos. It is surely by an amateur but think the artist has something going for them. The trees have a bit of a fantastical/surreal quality about them and I like that they are not so literal. I also like the color choices. </p><p><br /></p><p>I can see why some people would like this. It would surely work in the right setting to help brighten a space. I personally like it but would not hang it. I just don't have that CA beach vibe going with my decor.... LOL! I have not owned it all that long. The canvas is a tad slack and I need to re-stretch it at some point. For now, it is just part of the hoard. I think it would sell readily on ebay at the right price. One of the best things going for it is its legitimate age, keeping with the style. </p><p><br /></p><p>Painting B is likely French. It is signed, <i>Ballon</i>. It is possibly by Luc Ballon. There is a work at askart that appears to be very similar attributed to him. I also find some very dissimilar works attributed to him so i am not confident in the attribution. There is an unattributed work on Trocadero that is definitely by the same artist. There are several other listed artists with this surname but none of them seem to fit. </p><p><br /></p><p>The subject painting is undated but appears to be from the 50s. As someone guessed, the frame is new and not original. I bought this on ebay and paid $100.00, including shipping. I purchased this, at least in part, for the frame. </p><p><br /></p><p>The seller listed the painting size as 16" x 20" and I intended to use the frame on another painting I have. When I got the painting, I found it was smaller. I asked the seller for a refund or for a partial discount. Instead, he had a similar 16" x 20" frame that he shipped to me for free. This was a great outcome, as similar frames of size can easily go for $100.00.</p><p><br /></p><p>Frame aside, I do like the painting. It was unattributed in the ebay listing and no photo was provided of the signature. I could tell it was signed but could not make it out. I was hoping it was a West coast painting but, it is what it is. The painting and frame is very much in keeping with my decor and I have this painting, as framed, hanging in my bedroom.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think the artist is trained and accomplished. As I mentioned before, the painting has a bit of a tonalist quality to it that I appreciate. You might also see that it owes a nod to the French Barbizon School, though quite removed in timeframe. There is not a lot in execution of this painting that I can fault.</p><p><br /></p><p>I get the feeling that some felt this painting dispassionate. I can buy that. However, I think there is merit to a serene landscape painting. I tend to gravitate to moody landscapes and this certainly fits the bill. I may not keep this painting forever but it certainly has a place in my collection for now.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="verybrad, post: 9818342, member: 37"]Guess I will wrap this pair up. I chose them since they were both seascapes with trees and very different in style. Ironically, I can't think these were painted more than a decade apart from each other. Painting A is, indeed, a CA seascape. It is signed D.S. Beech and dated 1961. I was never able to attribute this to a particular person. I am sure the frame is original, as it is so in keeping with the timeframe. I picked this from a thrift store and think I paid $7.00 for it. It has a modernist sensibility to it and exhibits some pallete knife work which doesn't really show in the photos. It is surely by an amateur but think the artist has something going for them. The trees have a bit of a fantastical/surreal quality about them and I like that they are not so literal. I also like the color choices. I can see why some people would like this. It would surely work in the right setting to help brighten a space. I personally like it but would not hang it. I just don't have that CA beach vibe going with my decor.... LOL! I have not owned it all that long. The canvas is a tad slack and I need to re-stretch it at some point. For now, it is just part of the hoard. I think it would sell readily on ebay at the right price. One of the best things going for it is its legitimate age, keeping with the style. Painting B is likely French. It is signed, [I]Ballon[/I]. It is possibly by Luc Ballon. There is a work at askart that appears to be very similar attributed to him. I also find some very dissimilar works attributed to him so i am not confident in the attribution. There is an unattributed work on Trocadero that is definitely by the same artist. There are several other listed artists with this surname but none of them seem to fit. The subject painting is undated but appears to be from the 50s. As someone guessed, the frame is new and not original. I bought this on ebay and paid $100.00, including shipping. I purchased this, at least in part, for the frame. The seller listed the painting size as 16" x 20" and I intended to use the frame on another painting I have. When I got the painting, I found it was smaller. I asked the seller for a refund or for a partial discount. Instead, he had a similar 16" x 20" frame that he shipped to me for free. This was a great outcome, as similar frames of size can easily go for $100.00. Frame aside, I do like the painting. It was unattributed in the ebay listing and no photo was provided of the signature. I could tell it was signed but could not make it out. I was hoping it was a West coast painting but, it is what it is. The painting and frame is very much in keeping with my decor and I have this painting, as framed, hanging in my bedroom. I think the artist is trained and accomplished. As I mentioned before, the painting has a bit of a tonalist quality to it that I appreciate. You might also see that it owes a nod to the French Barbizon School, though quite removed in timeframe. There is not a lot in execution of this painting that I can fault. I get the feeling that some felt this painting dispassionate. I can buy that. However, I think there is merit to a serene landscape painting. I tend to gravitate to moody landscapes and this certainly fits the bill. I may not keep this painting forever but it certainly has a place in my collection for now.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
New game: Yea or Nay?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...