Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
New game: Yea or Nay?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TheOLdGuy, post: 120551, member: 878"]Brad, may I ask a question, please? </p><p>A few years ago I brought a rather large oil on canvas, about 4'x3', to a "restorer." It had one tear and was quite darkened. To show me what it entailed he dipped a <b>Q-tip </b>into a liquid and applied it to a section of the canvas. </p><p>After watching for ten minutes or so I made a wild guess that at that speed it would take him perhaps two months @ 40 hours per week to finish the cleaning. Then x hours to repair the tear. </p><p>Is my WAG correct? Is that how one would go about cleaning it?</p><p><br /></p><p>The frame was the typical elaborate gilded plaster on wood and was also in need of moderate repair. Speaking about it to an auctioneer I knew he made a statement I didn't question but didn't know if I heard correctly - that the frame might not be worth restoring but a new one could actually cost more than restoration. </p><p><br /></p><p>That painting was my Grandparents and had been put in the attic because of the tear, and had been there for perhaps 80+- years. </p><p><br /></p><p>That painting unfortunately suffered additional damage and I decided it would not be worth restoring.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TheOLdGuy, post: 120551, member: 878"]Brad, may I ask a question, please? A few years ago I brought a rather large oil on canvas, about 4'x3', to a "restorer." It had one tear and was quite darkened. To show me what it entailed he dipped a [B]Q-tip [/B]into a liquid and applied it to a section of the canvas. After watching for ten minutes or so I made a wild guess that at that speed it would take him perhaps two months @ 40 hours per week to finish the cleaning. Then x hours to repair the tear. Is my WAG correct? Is that how one would go about cleaning it? The frame was the typical elaborate gilded plaster on wood and was also in need of moderate repair. Speaking about it to an auctioneer I knew he made a statement I didn't question but didn't know if I heard correctly - that the frame might not be worth restoring but a new one could actually cost more than restoration. That painting was my Grandparents and had been put in the attic because of the tear, and had been there for perhaps 80+- years. That painting unfortunately suffered additional damage and I decided it would not be worth restoring.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
New game: Yea or Nay?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...