Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mat, post: 119979, member: 369&quot;]I think it is totally inacceptable to call members of this forum that offer their experience and opinions for free &quot;trolls&quot;, just because they do not have the same opinion as you have! </p><p>For all who are really interested in learning more, I show here two nearly identical examples that were made by &quot;De porceleyne Schotel&quot;, an 18th c workshop from Delft: <a href="http://risdmuseum.org/art_design/objects/5289_tea_caddy" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://risdmuseum.org/art_design/objects/5289_tea_caddy" rel="nofollow">http://risdmuseum.org/art_design/objects/5289_tea_caddy</a> ; <a href="https://www.auktionshaus-stahl.de/katalog-archiv.php?detail=65130&amp;katalog=16" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.auktionshaus-stahl.de/katalog-archiv.php?detail=65130&amp;katalog=16" rel="nofollow">https://www.auktionshaus-stahl.de/katalog-archiv.php?detail=65130&amp;katalog=16</a> . As there are some differences in quality and colour, and the mark on the piece that is discussed here is not that of &quot;De porceleyne Schotel&quot; ( see here: <a href="http://www.delftsaardewerk.nl/keys/view/ivduijn/1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.delftsaardewerk.nl/keys/view/ivduijn/1" rel="nofollow">http://www.delftsaardewerk.nl/keys/view/ivduijn/1</a> ), I would think that it is a likely later copy of that model.</p><p>Mat[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in