Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
Marc Chagall Bouquet de Fleurs Lithograph Poster
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kardinalisimo, post: 7092, member: 118"]I don't know. There is nobody else to talk to. I feel like discussing(arguing). I can't believe I got you the ADL gift shop. You seem unbeatable</p><p>I pretty much got everything but one - so, according to you all museum posters are offsets and there is no such thing as original lithographic poster made straight from the stone? Or maybe I got you wrong.</p><p>There are original posters made personally by Chagall, lithographs, signed, with text of the events, printed and published by reputable European houses.</p><p>I also consider the posters done by Charles Sorlier to be kind of 'original' or at least much more valuable than the reproduction ones. They were stone lithographs, made with the permission and under the supervision of Chagall himself. I wish I bought one of these for a dollar. </p><p>My poster, I don't know. I cannot tell if it is a litho or not. Wish I knew how to do that. Looks better than cheap print but I don't have a lot of experience handling originals. But if you say it is not, I believe you because you seems to have a good knowledge in prints. </p><p><br /></p><p>Now, I would be happy to hear your comment on the Mao serigraph from my other topic. Is there anyway I can find if it is an original serigraph or a reproduction? According to its size it is possible the publishers and printers text to have been trimmed. It is just a bit narrower than what the original is supposed to be. </p><p>Thanks[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kardinalisimo, post: 7092, member: 118"]I don't know. There is nobody else to talk to. I feel like discussing(arguing). I can't believe I got you the ADL gift shop. You seem unbeatable I pretty much got everything but one - so, according to you all museum posters are offsets and there is no such thing as original lithographic poster made straight from the stone? Or maybe I got you wrong. There are original posters made personally by Chagall, lithographs, signed, with text of the events, printed and published by reputable European houses. I also consider the posters done by Charles Sorlier to be kind of 'original' or at least much more valuable than the reproduction ones. They were stone lithographs, made with the permission and under the supervision of Chagall himself. I wish I bought one of these for a dollar. My poster, I don't know. I cannot tell if it is a litho or not. Wish I knew how to do that. Looks better than cheap print but I don't have a lot of experience handling originals. But if you say it is not, I believe you because you seems to have a good knowledge in prints. Now, I would be happy to hear your comment on the Mao serigraph from my other topic. Is there anyway I can find if it is an original serigraph or a reproduction? According to its size it is possible the publishers and printers text to have been trimmed. It is just a bit narrower than what the original is supposed to be. Thanks[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
Marc Chagall Bouquet de Fleurs Lithograph Poster
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...