Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Dessert58, post: 10210551, member: 78465&quot;][ATTACH=full]510306[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]510305[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]510304[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]510303[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]510302[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]510301[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]510300[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]510299[/ATTACH] So, I bought a lot with some Flemish jewelry a few weeks ago, and these three crosses were in it. (Ca 1860-1880 s, diamond on foil, silver, gold back).</p><p>In my country (country of origin of these crosses) you dont find these crosses often, but if you do they are usually not very expensive.</p><p>So I just buy them whenever I find them for cheap.</p><p>One cross is all original with nice quality foiled back rose cut diamonds. The second cross also has nice big stones, but it misses its complete center part.</p><p>The third cross misses its top part, its center stone and some surrounding stones.</p><p>I do happen to have a part laying around that could make a good center part for the second cross.</p><p>I m still not sure if I would pair them because the part I had laying around only has a tiny size senaille/diamond...what would you do?</p><p>For comparison I show you in the last two pictures my other Flemish crosses and a &#039;Vlaams Hart&#039; to show you how some of these crosses also have a top part and others have a gold ring just like the Heart.</p><p>So...what do you think? Let the second cross be repaired or wait till I find the &#039;perfect&#039; middle part?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in