Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;DragonflyWink, post: 9844201, member: 111&quot;]Thanks, Jeff - I always enjoy your posts as well...</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I understand your feelings all too well, over the years, on other forums/groups, as well as here, I&#039;ve had the same experiences, including when posting period advertisements, catalog pages, etc. that are very reliable reference.&nbsp; One somewhat ignorant person mocked my use of &quot;old books&#039;, because I challenged his ridiculous theories, and another person, who should have known better, frantically lambasted me with links to silver marks sites showing a mark as &#039;unidentified&#039;, and weirdly asking why it wasn&#039;t found in a respected book - even though I&#039;d stated that the mark had just recently been firmly IDed and posted an image of the original trademark registration.&nbsp; There should be an exchange of opinions in any group, but when when facts are ignored, it is indeed frustrating.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Was pretty sure I&#039;d seen it somewhere (I like English lusterware), but it&#039;s harder these days to navigate the mess of basically useless information in my head - and you know how I respect your knowledge of British pottery.&nbsp; Wishing you luck in the hunt!!!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>~Cheryl[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in