Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Antique Discussion
>
HUGE carved wood chinese emporer and empress
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Any Jewelry, post: 9634811, member: 2844"]I think your thoughts didn't make it all the way to your earlier posts, it happens sometimes. This mode of communication is not the best for making ourselves understood.</p><p>I understand what you are saying from a dualist viewpoint. Dualism isn't exactly my background, but obviously my theology study delved deep into it. Later studies and living in a Western culture also helped, but my own perception is more towards non-dualism.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think many people think or hope that (a) God can and should intervene. Many others don't think of (a) God in that way though. Expectations versus simply being, I guess.</p><p><br /></p><p>Mysticism may have seekers, but I doubt they'll get to where they want to be. It either hits you or it doesn't.</p><p><br /></p><p>I don't know what you mean by practitioners. When you have one or more mystical experiences you contemplate on it, of course. Many mystics try to live in harmony with what they perceive to be important, but so do many non-mystics.</p><p><br /></p><p>Mysticism as such doesn't, but its interpretation into a worldly context does. At least 99% gets lost in translation. Which is why many mystics don't talk about it. Others place it in the context of their culture and time.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think you'll find I didn't express my view of purity in the sense of dark and light, or spiritual, religious or otherwise. I don't find it necessary to have a view.</p><p><br /></p><p>I mentioned the purity of real mysticism, as in, mysticism without any other disciplines, techniques, etc mixed in. Just like a pot of pure blue paint without any yellow mixed in.</p><p>Some things can be purely what they are, and when something else is mixed in they stop being what they are. As simple as that.</p><p><br /></p><p>Obviously, but that has nothing to do with what we were discussing.</p><p><br /></p><p>They can't agree on what? I don't quite follow you.</p><p><br /></p><p>That's OK, you expressed it differently at first, but it is clear now.</p><p><br /></p><p>What is not clear is the "greatest minds can’t agree" statement. They probably can't agree on a lot of things, but what exactly do you mean?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Any Jewelry, post: 9634811, member: 2844"]I think your thoughts didn't make it all the way to your earlier posts, it happens sometimes. This mode of communication is not the best for making ourselves understood. I understand what you are saying from a dualist viewpoint. Dualism isn't exactly my background, but obviously my theology study delved deep into it. Later studies and living in a Western culture also helped, but my own perception is more towards non-dualism. I think many people think or hope that (a) God can and should intervene. Many others don't think of (a) God in that way though. Expectations versus simply being, I guess. Mysticism may have seekers, but I doubt they'll get to where they want to be. It either hits you or it doesn't. I don't know what you mean by practitioners. When you have one or more mystical experiences you contemplate on it, of course. Many mystics try to live in harmony with what they perceive to be important, but so do many non-mystics. Mysticism as such doesn't, but its interpretation into a worldly context does. At least 99% gets lost in translation. Which is why many mystics don't talk about it. Others place it in the context of their culture and time. I think you'll find I didn't express my view of purity in the sense of dark and light, or spiritual, religious or otherwise. I don't find it necessary to have a view. I mentioned the purity of real mysticism, as in, mysticism without any other disciplines, techniques, etc mixed in. Just like a pot of pure blue paint without any yellow mixed in. Some things can be purely what they are, and when something else is mixed in they stop being what they are. As simple as that. Obviously, but that has nothing to do with what we were discussing. They can't agree on what? I don't quite follow you. That's OK, you expressed it differently at first, but it is clear now. What is not clear is the "greatest minds can’t agree" statement. They probably can't agree on a lot of things, but what exactly do you mean?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Antique Discussion
>
HUGE carved wood chinese emporer and empress
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...