Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;bluumz, post: 9435356, member: 649&quot;]For reference, <a href="http://www.thepotteries.org/allpotters/265.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.thepotteries.org/allpotters/265.htm" rel="nofollow">thepotteries.org</a> lists the mark as post-1949, as you say.</p><p>The pattern likely never had a name.</p><p>I am an avid collector of English china cups/saucers (don&#039;t ask me how many I have, I honestly don&#039;t know!). Royal Standard is considered rather low end and your pattern, though pretty, is not particularly desirable. Sorry, just keeping it real!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Agree. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":)" unselectable="on" /></p><p>In my area of the US, I would consider myself lucky to achieve $50 for that particular set. (Teapots are the most valuable piece in a tea set and yours is missing that key item.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in