Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Gold Charm fact check
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Any Jewelry, post: 2203551, member: 2844"]It is gorgeous, and to me it looks right for the period. The eyes could be rubies or maybe spinels. </p><p>Spinel was a popular stone at the time, it can be just as red as rubies, and it has very faint to no fluorescence.</p><p><br /></p><p>And probably about Burmese rubies. Ruby fluorescence is caused by chromium content, but if the rubies contain iron oxide as well, that has a negative effect on the fluorescence. Siam and Sri Lankan rubies, for instance, hardly fluoresce at all.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Any Jewelry, post: 2203551, member: 2844"]It is gorgeous, and to me it looks right for the period. The eyes could be rubies or maybe spinels. Spinel was a popular stone at the time, it can be just as red as rubies, and it has very faint to no fluorescence. And probably about Burmese rubies. Ruby fluorescence is caused by chromium content, but if the rubies contain iron oxide as well, that has a negative effect on the fluorescence. Siam and Sri Lankan rubies, for instance, hardly fluoresce at all.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Gold Charm fact check
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...