Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;lloyd249, post: 244692, member: 1211&quot;]would you say this is a match&nbsp; for 2 different paintings done by the same artist (side by side) , or do you think they were done years apart with by 2 different artists 2 different sets of brushes, and&nbsp; 2 different kinds of&nbsp; paints ,pictures of my chair on the right ,$50 million&nbsp; on the left&nbsp;&nbsp; except frame 3 is upside down ?.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]75031[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]75032[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]75033[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]75034[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]75041[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]75050[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]75052[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]75051[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>(one experts opinion )&quot;</p><p>Dear Lloyd,</p><p>Thank you for the photographs.</p><p>Unfortunately without the aid of examining the chair in person, In my humble opinion, I do not believe this chair was painted by Picasso. While the cracking may cause the chair to appear to have been painted a long time ago, the brilliant colors reveal that it is not that old. The white paint used by Picasso had a lot of lead content. The white portions of the chair would have yellowed somewhat. The paint used to paint the chair appears to be an acrylic – Picasso never used acrylic paint. This was invented in the 50s, and really only came into use in the 60s &amp; 70s – mostly by the American abstract expressionists. Picasso had a unique style to his signature that does not match the signature on your chair. I believe the chair was created recently. It appears to be the type of chair that might sell in a hipster furniture store or art gallery. Personally, I think the chair is a great object of art and I bet it looks awesome in your home.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in