Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Figtree3, post: 9814494, member: 33&quot;]I agree with other opinions that none of them look all that much like the Earp family. Also, the date of 1893 seems spot on. Could be a year later. As mentioned earlier, the puffy sleeves on the women&#039;s dresses were in vogue in the 1890s... not before.</p><p><br /></p><p>The writing in the upper right could (maybe) be a name -- &quot;M. D. Tait&quot; -- There is a partial crossbar to the right of the final letter. So it could be a &quot;t.&quot; The first letter could be &quot;H.&quot; but it looks a bit more like &quot;M.&quot; I&#039;m also not positive about the capital &quot;T&quot; but probably.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, the handwriting could have been added at any time after the picture was taken. It&#039;s obvious from what you&#039;ve already uncovered that there are inaccuracies (Goldfield not being named Goldfield in the 1890s, for example). This kind of identification project can be tricky. But fun![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in