Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Silver
>
Did they really?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TheOLdGuy, post: 84054, member: 878"]Seems very, VERY unusual at that time period Wallace - or anyone else - would take the time to punch in numbers simply for inventory purposes. Or matching tops and bottoms. </p><p>Westmoreland was one well known for using "inventory" numbers on tops and bottoms. But that was to match the bottoms to three or more different tops. "This is a #2 base and will accommodate tops 3, 5 and 6." </p><p>Why would Wallace "count" each piece as it progressed through the factory? Beyond me. </p><p>Cheryl's thought was maybe right????[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TheOLdGuy, post: 84054, member: 878"]Seems very, VERY unusual at that time period Wallace - or anyone else - would take the time to punch in numbers simply for inventory purposes. Or matching tops and bottoms. Westmoreland was one well known for using "inventory" numbers on tops and bottoms. But that was to match the bottoms to three or more different tops. "This is a #2 base and will accommodate tops 3, 5 and 6." Why would Wallace "count" each piece as it progressed through the factory? Beyond me. Cheryl's thought was maybe right????[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Silver
>
Did they really?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...