Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain
>
Chinese vase, auction win, thoughts?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="mmarco102, post: 9771915, member: 8289"]I think it’s unquestionably decorative, not collectible and that is how it will remain for a hundred year. I won’t be around to judge its collectibility at that latter time. I kind of knew that after just a few helpful post & messages yesterday.</p><p><br /></p><p>dubious sellers along with ignorant ones will always be questionable. But UW never made such a claim.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>‘and yet it seems ok for them… 1824?</p><p>“They started making porcelain reproductions of the Ming plates<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:15-17" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:15-17" rel="nofollow">[17]</a> around the end of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II" rel="nofollow">World War II</a>, as the amount of porcelain available to import declined.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:7-7" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:7-7" rel="nofollow">[7]</a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:2-14" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:2-14" rel="nofollow">[14]</a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:3-15" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:3-15" rel="nofollow">[15]</a> The move made Mottahedeh & Co. one of the earliest companies to make such reproductions.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:18-19" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:18-19" rel="nofollow">[18]</a> As a pioneer in the field at a time when many museums frowned upon reproductions, Mottahedeh advocated heavily in favor of them, saying "If we didn't reprint books, look at how much we'd lose in history ... The same is true of porcelain. If we didn't remake them, we'd lose all those designs."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:19-20" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:19-20" rel="nofollow">[19]</a> She also described the reproductions as "democratizing" porcelain.”</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]481922[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="mmarco102, post: 9771915, member: 8289"]I think it’s unquestionably decorative, not collectible and that is how it will remain for a hundred year. I won’t be around to judge its collectibility at that latter time. I kind of knew that after just a few helpful post & messages yesterday. dubious sellers along with ignorant ones will always be questionable. But UW never made such a claim. ‘and yet it seems ok for them… 1824? “They started making porcelain reproductions of the Ming plates[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:15-17'][17][/URL] around the end of [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II']World War II[/URL], as the amount of porcelain available to import declined.[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:7-7'][7][/URL][URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:2-14'][14][/URL][URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:3-15'][15][/URL] The move made Mottahedeh & Co. one of the earliest companies to make such reproductions.[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:18-19'][18][/URL] As a pioneer in the field at a time when many museums frowned upon reproductions, Mottahedeh advocated heavily in favor of them, saying "If we didn't reprint books, look at how much we'd lose in history ... The same is true of porcelain. If we didn't remake them, we'd lose all those designs."[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Mottahedeh#cite_note-:19-20'][19][/URL] She also described the reproductions as "democratizing" porcelain.” [ATTACH=full]481922[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain
>
Chinese vase, auction win, thoughts?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...