Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
CAMEOS: Show & Tell or Ask & Answer
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="mirana, post: 9605101, member: 79705"]I have been selling in that place since '96 but mostly items from collections I was no longer interested in, and the occasional thrift item. But it's such a grind, even without Bay's punishing algorithm, randomly hiding your listings, giving money back to grifters and the fee drain! I'm trying to work through the last big push of things I've accumulated in the "I'm done with this" pile, and then it's just going to be on the rare occasions I find something worth a really good amount, or sell off lot items I didn't want. I work too many hours for way more money to make it worthwhile.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Can't wait for the freshly cleaned version! She has a really sweet face and I always enjoy the carvers who give their figures diaphanous fabric. The other you found does look to share some of the same carving choices that may mean it is the same person.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Hmm, inscribing on a small concave surface that is fairly delicate might make things difficult (the shells or stones are usually mounted on the back during the carving). The carving itself is done by tools like in wood carving, or by drill bits so not the same as scratching a surface. I usually see really nice signatures when it's on the face of the carving, as a presentation surface. They probably didn't think the backs were as important.</p><p><br /></p><p>Bronwen has <a href="https://www.antiquers.com/threads/cameos-show-tell-or-ask-answer.23493/page-132#post-836666" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.antiquers.com/threads/cameos-show-tell-or-ask-answer.23493/page-132#post-836666">a really nice example of a fraudulent signature</a> in this thread, for Saulini. I think few rise to the price point to warrant a fake signature though. Most sellers don't seem to care to mention signatures unless it's Saulini. I've even seen a Pichler intaglio with a clear front signature not be mentioned at all, and that seemed insane to me. There was definitely a trade in fraudulent carvings and signatures in the 1800s, but for pieces passed off as ancient.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="mirana, post: 9605101, member: 79705"]I have been selling in that place since '96 but mostly items from collections I was no longer interested in, and the occasional thrift item. But it's such a grind, even without Bay's punishing algorithm, randomly hiding your listings, giving money back to grifters and the fee drain! I'm trying to work through the last big push of things I've accumulated in the "I'm done with this" pile, and then it's just going to be on the rare occasions I find something worth a really good amount, or sell off lot items I didn't want. I work too many hours for way more money to make it worthwhile. Can't wait for the freshly cleaned version! She has a really sweet face and I always enjoy the carvers who give their figures diaphanous fabric. The other you found does look to share some of the same carving choices that may mean it is the same person. Hmm, inscribing on a small concave surface that is fairly delicate might make things difficult (the shells or stones are usually mounted on the back during the carving). The carving itself is done by tools like in wood carving, or by drill bits so not the same as scratching a surface. I usually see really nice signatures when it's on the face of the carving, as a presentation surface. They probably didn't think the backs were as important. Bronwen has [URL='https://www.antiquers.com/threads/cameos-show-tell-or-ask-answer.23493/page-132#post-836666']a really nice example of a fraudulent signature[/URL] in this thread, for Saulini. I think few rise to the price point to warrant a fake signature though. Most sellers don't seem to care to mention signatures unless it's Saulini. I've even seen a Pichler intaglio with a clear front signature not be mentioned at all, and that seemed insane to me. There was definitely a trade in fraudulent carvings and signatures in the 1800s, but for pieces passed off as ancient.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
CAMEOS: Show & Tell or Ask & Answer
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...