Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Bronwen, post: 2063706, member: 5833&quot;]She&#039;s lovely.&nbsp; Sort of a transitional type I think: not a portrait; not quite a conventional Flora.&nbsp; There was definitely a period when it was a &#039;thing&#039; to present subjects full frontal.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>That&#039;s where I would place it, maybe between the wars.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This is where we really need [USER=8184]@Jivvy[/USER]&nbsp; The marks certainly look like they should be a signature, not random scratches, but very crudely done, out of keeping with the skill of the cameo.&nbsp; Afraid it&#039;s not ringing any bells.&nbsp; I looked through my (incomplete) list of 20th century cutters, but none seemed like a match.&nbsp; You see it best.&nbsp; What do you make of it?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in