Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
CAMEOS: Show & Tell or Ask & Answer
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 1634744, member: 5833"]I've been thinking about these all afternoon & still not sure what to tell you about them. Only the 2 red ones really qualify as seals, & then only if they were ever actually used in the way genuine seals are, to validate the authenticity of something. There's a whole field of study, sigilography, that takes them up. The others would all be considered impressions of engraved gems & so would the red ones if they were only made to show what the seal looked like.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have one of these with white on red. It's a strange material, very thin & light in weight, that seems like it should be fragile & brittle but is instead quite plastic & resilient. Mine is a bit cupped; found no way to flatten it. This is the first time I have seen ones in these Wedgwood blues & blacks & lavenders. I think the material is 'sulphur', sometimes called 'sulphur wax', but the final red product is not what you think of as waxy. I have no idea how the pieces here that are not red were made.</p><p><br /></p><p>Like you, I have not seen these on line, only <a href="https://art.thewalters.org/detail/96217/drawer-of-gem-impressions/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://art.thewalters.org/detail/96217/drawer-of-gem-impressions/" rel="nofollow">the type shown here</a>, much thicker, with the gold paper collars. As you can see, these impressions are not the most accurate, with spots dropping out of the white layer. Suspect the technique was developed to compete with the gem impressions being made by Tassie & others & madly collected by the public at large, but results generally not satisfactory so never caught on.</p><p><br /></p><p>I would class these as a really interesting novelty for someone like me who's interested in the history as well as in the gems themselves. Without anything to compare them to, no past auction outcomes, it's impossible to value them. Intrinsic value is nil. There's nothing among the subjects to give them exceptional interest, quite a miscellany. Unless any frames add value, I would say low end of estimate range is reasonable if you want them as a curiosity for yourself. I would not count on resale value, although might do well in front of the right audience. Right now they're decor.</p><p><br /></p><p>Is that indecisive enough for you? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":)" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 1634744, member: 5833"]I've been thinking about these all afternoon & still not sure what to tell you about them. Only the 2 red ones really qualify as seals, & then only if they were ever actually used in the way genuine seals are, to validate the authenticity of something. There's a whole field of study, sigilography, that takes them up. The others would all be considered impressions of engraved gems & so would the red ones if they were only made to show what the seal looked like. I have one of these with white on red. It's a strange material, very thin & light in weight, that seems like it should be fragile & brittle but is instead quite plastic & resilient. Mine is a bit cupped; found no way to flatten it. This is the first time I have seen ones in these Wedgwood blues & blacks & lavenders. I think the material is 'sulphur', sometimes called 'sulphur wax', but the final red product is not what you think of as waxy. I have no idea how the pieces here that are not red were made. Like you, I have not seen these on line, only [URL='https://art.thewalters.org/detail/96217/drawer-of-gem-impressions/']the type shown here[/URL], much thicker, with the gold paper collars. As you can see, these impressions are not the most accurate, with spots dropping out of the white layer. Suspect the technique was developed to compete with the gem impressions being made by Tassie & others & madly collected by the public at large, but results generally not satisfactory so never caught on. I would class these as a really interesting novelty for someone like me who's interested in the history as well as in the gems themselves. Without anything to compare them to, no past auction outcomes, it's impossible to value them. Intrinsic value is nil. There's nothing among the subjects to give them exceptional interest, quite a miscellany. Unless any frames add value, I would say low end of estimate range is reasonable if you want them as a curiosity for yourself. I would not count on resale value, although might do well in front of the right audience. Right now they're decor. Is that indecisive enough for you? :)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
CAMEOS: Show & Tell or Ask & Answer
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...