Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mirana, post: 10091415, member: 79705&quot;]Well, strictly speaking the original image is Victorian. It is <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Psycheabduct.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Psycheabduct.jpg" rel="nofollow"><i>The Abduction of Psyche</i> by Bouguereau in 1895</a>. He loved the subject, and of course did many nudes. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie59" alt=":kiss:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Love was a very popular subject to wear so if it was in the context of classical mythology I think it got more of a pass.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]506545[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/188954" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/188954" rel="nofollow">Canova did his version in 1787</a> (and copies thereafter). That one on a wearer&#039;s bosom would be even more the sight! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/tongue.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":p" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]506546[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Closest I&#039;ve got in my collection is a bunch of nude putti and Queen V herself. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie51" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> This one is 2.5&quot; so hard to miss, but I&#039;m guessing nude mythological &quot;children&quot; are a bit more tame.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]506547[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in