Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Cameo Signature Help Needed
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 854239, member: 5833"]'Portrait of my sister' is also listed as having been shown in the exhibition of 1846. Suppose could be a different version/sister. Imagine doing these compiled 'dictionaries', like the one for the RA contributors & Forrer's massive work (or the OED!), entirely by writing up, then sorting & resorting index cards by hand, perhaps with some assistants who turned over frequently. If the 1838 catalogue was published contemporaneously with the show, would expect it to be correct in most ways. The Mrs./Miss discrepancy is something that probably happened regularly & think we can go with Miss. One possibility is that Nichols was supposed to exhibit in 1838 but withdrew her contributions after the catalogue was printed, electing to hold them back until future years. Graves may have had access to other documentation that was more accurate about what really was & wasn't shown. The index for 1838 picks up only Highgate, work #489, not the sister, #790, so a couple of slips in 1838.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 854239, member: 5833"]'Portrait of my sister' is also listed as having been shown in the exhibition of 1846. Suppose could be a different version/sister. Imagine doing these compiled 'dictionaries', like the one for the RA contributors & Forrer's massive work (or the OED!), entirely by writing up, then sorting & resorting index cards by hand, perhaps with some assistants who turned over frequently. If the 1838 catalogue was published contemporaneously with the show, would expect it to be correct in most ways. The Mrs./Miss discrepancy is something that probably happened regularly & think we can go with Miss. One possibility is that Nichols was supposed to exhibit in 1838 but withdrew her contributions after the catalogue was printed, electing to hold them back until future years. Graves may have had access to other documentation that was more accurate about what really was & wasn't shown. The index for 1838 picks up only Highgate, work #489, not the sister, #790, so a couple of slips in 1838.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Cameo Signature Help Needed
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...