authentic Ming ceramics?

Discussion in 'Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain' started by sunday silence, Jan 12, 2023.

Page 2 of 2
  1. sunday silence

    sunday silence Well-Known Member

    what does this sentence mean? WHy should it be $80,000? We just established the vase is not authentic.
     

    Attached Files:

    • wink.png
      wink.png
      File size:
      1,004 bytes
      Views:
      32
    sunday silence, Jan 14, 2023
    #21 + Quote Reply
  2. stracci

    stracci Well-Known Member

    If I saw this in the thrift shop, I'd assume a cheap repro and walk right past.
    The quality is horrible. The design appears to be stamped for cryin' out loud.
     
    stracci, Jan 14, 2023
    #22 + Quote Reply
    kyratango, komokwa and charlie cheswick like this.
  3. charlie cheswick

    charlie cheswick Well-Known Member

    If it was authentic then it would be worth that much

    Meaning a REAL one would be worth that much not $800 puny dollars

    Knock knock, anybody home ?
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2023
    charlie cheswick, Jan 14, 2023
    #23 + Quote Reply
    kyratango and komokwa like this.
  4. Jose Deleon

    Jose Deleon Active Member

    Not my period on my radar but hell naw
     
    Jose Deleon, Jan 15, 2023
    #24 + Quote Reply
    charlie cheswick likes this.
Page 2 of 2
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Threads: authentic Ming
Forum Title Date
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain said to be Ming dynasty, does it look authentic? Nov 7, 2021
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain Said to be a Ming dragon vase, does it look authentic? May 22, 2021
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain Said to be Ming porcelain from Wan Li period. Does it look authentic? May 11, 2021
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain KPM mark authenticity question Dec 30, 2023
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain Authentic Lalique? Jul 18, 2023

Share This Page