Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Silver
>
Are these real silver & who might've made them ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="DragonflyWink, post: 9495667, member: 111"]You are mistaken - it is not true that Gorham's <i>"Lion-Anchor-G (LAG) would always be accompanied by the words “sterling” or “coin” on silver pieces, they also produced plated pieces with the LAG marking omitting the purity designation."</i> Again, as previously stated, and as indicated in the 1869 advertisement posted, as well as numerous other ads over decades, their lion-anchor-G mark is an indication and guarantee of solid silver, the anchor on its own indicating silverplate - there are quite a few Gorham silver pieces without indication of fineness, especially in coin - those with knowledge of Gorham marks are likely snapping up all those silver pieces dismissed as silverplate.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>If sellers and buyers are mistaking Gorham for Birmingham silver in this age of easily accessed information, it's just an indication that they've not done their research. Gorham was a prolific manufacturer that advertised their trademark heavily, and the form resembling British hallmarks was certainly a respectful nod, but no need or intention to deceive, frankly their silver was highly regarded, their mark well-known, and they were primarily wholesalers to the trade, so they certainly weren't trying to 'fool' their retailers. Might also keep in mind that British hallmarks required a fourth mark, the maker/sponsor mark - Gorham's various versions of its 'lion-anchor-G',<i> was</i> their maker's mark.</p><p><br /></p><p>Gorham was not the only maker to use marks that resembled British hallmarks, they were commonly used by 19th century American coin silver makers (well before Gorham's mark), along with later silver and silverplate manufacturers (well into the 20th century), quite a few Canadian companies also used pseudo-marks, like P.W. Ellis' 'anchor-maple leaf w/E-lion' mark, and even English silverplate manufacturers used pseudo-marks, not to cheat or fool buyers, whether at wholesale or retail, but they might fool those guests who flip a piece over for a peek...</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Eh, believe what you like, and I'll do the same.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Would suggest their possible imaginary thoughts might have been, "This is a common form for an American mark, we'll use a lion for silver, because its a known symbol, an anchor for Rhode Island, and a 'G' because, well, we're Gorham."</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Nope, "nothing innovative or new about its design" - just a basic manufacturer's trademark that served them well, regardless of your opinion...</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>~Cheryl[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="DragonflyWink, post: 9495667, member: 111"]You are mistaken - it is not true that Gorham's [I]"Lion-Anchor-G (LAG) would always be accompanied by the words “sterling” or “coin” on silver pieces, they also produced plated pieces with the LAG marking omitting the purity designation."[/I] Again, as previously stated, and as indicated in the 1869 advertisement posted, as well as numerous other ads over decades, their lion-anchor-G mark is an indication and guarantee of solid silver, the anchor on its own indicating silverplate - there are quite a few Gorham silver pieces without indication of fineness, especially in coin - those with knowledge of Gorham marks are likely snapping up all those silver pieces dismissed as silverplate. If sellers and buyers are mistaking Gorham for Birmingham silver in this age of easily accessed information, it's just an indication that they've not done their research. Gorham was a prolific manufacturer that advertised their trademark heavily, and the form resembling British hallmarks was certainly a respectful nod, but no need or intention to deceive, frankly their silver was highly regarded, their mark well-known, and they were primarily wholesalers to the trade, so they certainly weren't trying to 'fool' their retailers. Might also keep in mind that British hallmarks required a fourth mark, the maker/sponsor mark - Gorham's various versions of its 'lion-anchor-G',[I] was[/I] their maker's mark. Gorham was not the only maker to use marks that resembled British hallmarks, they were commonly used by 19th century American coin silver makers (well before Gorham's mark), along with later silver and silverplate manufacturers (well into the 20th century), quite a few Canadian companies also used pseudo-marks, like P.W. Ellis' 'anchor-maple leaf w/E-lion' mark, and even English silverplate manufacturers used pseudo-marks, not to cheat or fool buyers, whether at wholesale or retail, but they might fool those guests who flip a piece over for a peek... Eh, believe what you like, and I'll do the same. Would suggest their possible imaginary thoughts might have been, "This is a common form for an American mark, we'll use a lion for silver, because its a known symbol, an anchor for Rhode Island, and a 'G' because, well, we're Gorham." Nope, "nothing innovative or new about its design" - just a basic manufacturer's trademark that served them well, regardless of your opinion... ~Cheryl[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Silver
>
Are these real silver & who might've made them ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...