Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Silver
>
Are these real silver & who might've made them ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="JewelryPicker, post: 9495369, member: 20513"]It’s a stretch to look at Gorham’s mark and pretend that it’s was completely organic. To me, it clearly mimics the English Birmingham mark with a G date letter. Cartouche shape generally varies by date letter but not always. Nobody has the entire system memorized and furthermore, consider the lack of online resources at the time. IMO, they intentionally copied the English mark at a time when English silver was a prized possession. They even used a LEFT facing Lion until 1868</p><p><br /></p><p>gorham followed by 2 English Birmingham marks for comparison:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]447479[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]447480[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]447481[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Gorham did not always clearly differentiate between coin/sterling and plated. Though it’s true that the Lion-Anchor-G (LAG) would always be accompanied by the words “sterling” or “coin” on silver pieces, they also produced plated pieces with the LAG marking omitting the purity designation. The only indication was a zero (0) to begin item/pattern number stamp. Not exactly an advertisement of composition, and easily mistaken for English silver.</p><p><br /></p><p>eBay, Etsy and an endless list of auction houses are chock full of Gorham items that are being bought and sold as Birmingham Sterling. I would guess that 99.9% are cases of innocent misidentification, but that is kinda my point. Gorham intentionally used a mark similar to an established English mark, so similar that it continues to fool people even today.</p><p><br /></p><p>the fact that Gorham renewed an established 137 year old (in 1990) trademark is not relevant because…well… it had been established for 137 years. I was speaking about trying to register a NEW mark that so closely mimicks and it could be argued, is intentionally deceptive. I understand the British hallmark system is likely not covered by US trademark, but I believe a new mark would be challenged </p><p><br /></p><p>when Gorham devised their mark, there certainty would have been 2 lines of thought:</p><p><br /></p><p>“Wow, that looks too close to an English mark”</p><p>Or</p><p>“Wow, that looks just like an English mark”</p><p><br /></p><p>There was nothing innovative or new about its design, it was an intentional copy of a mark known throughout the world and regarded as the highest of quality[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="JewelryPicker, post: 9495369, member: 20513"]It’s a stretch to look at Gorham’s mark and pretend that it’s was completely organic. To me, it clearly mimics the English Birmingham mark with a G date letter. Cartouche shape generally varies by date letter but not always. Nobody has the entire system memorized and furthermore, consider the lack of online resources at the time. IMO, they intentionally copied the English mark at a time when English silver was a prized possession. They even used a LEFT facing Lion until 1868 gorham followed by 2 English Birmingham marks for comparison: [ATTACH=full]447479[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]447480[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]447481[/ATTACH] Gorham did not always clearly differentiate between coin/sterling and plated. Though it’s true that the Lion-Anchor-G (LAG) would always be accompanied by the words “sterling” or “coin” on silver pieces, they also produced plated pieces with the LAG marking omitting the purity designation. The only indication was a zero (0) to begin item/pattern number stamp. Not exactly an advertisement of composition, and easily mistaken for English silver. eBay, Etsy and an endless list of auction houses are chock full of Gorham items that are being bought and sold as Birmingham Sterling. I would guess that 99.9% are cases of innocent misidentification, but that is kinda my point. Gorham intentionally used a mark similar to an established English mark, so similar that it continues to fool people even today. the fact that Gorham renewed an established 137 year old (in 1990) trademark is not relevant because…well… it had been established for 137 years. I was speaking about trying to register a NEW mark that so closely mimicks and it could be argued, is intentionally deceptive. I understand the British hallmark system is likely not covered by US trademark, but I believe a new mark would be challenged when Gorham devised their mark, there certainty would have been 2 lines of thought: “Wow, that looks too close to an English mark” Or “Wow, that looks just like an English mark” There was nothing innovative or new about its design, it was an intentional copy of a mark known throughout the world and regarded as the highest of quality[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Silver
>
Are these real silver & who might've made them ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...