Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SBSVC, post: 338771, member: 136&quot;]I didn&#039;t add this to Bronwen&#039;s CAMEO thread, since I honestly don&#039;t know if this is considered a cameo or not.</p><p><br /></p><p>This bracelet was given to me in the late 1980&#039;s, and I have never worn it - in fact, I had completely forgotten that I even had it. (I encountered it today while getting something else out of an old jewelry box.)</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, it&#039;s 7&quot; long,<i> excluding</i> the clasp &quot;end bits&quot;, and it is clearly marked <font size="3">750</font> and <font size="3">ITALY</font>. The center &quot;cameo part&quot; is about <font size="3">1/2</font>&quot; in diameter. </p><p><br /></p><p>The bracelet itself comprises some 16-18 (I keep losing count) thin gold chain strands, held together by gold bars at both the cameo ends and the clasp ends. (I&#039;ve separated some of the strands in some of the photos so you can see what it is I&#039;m trying to explain.)</p><p><br /></p><p>First of all, is this a cameo? Do you think it is glass? (It is cold to the touch.)</p><p><br /></p><p>Second, do you think this was new in the 1980&#039;s, when it was given to me? The clasp isn&#039;t quite the same &quot;lobster&quot; I&#039;m used to from that era, but perhaps it&#039;s still considered a lobster clasp?</p><p><br /></p><p>Finally, any and all comments will be greatly appreciated!</p><p>Thank you!</p><p>[ATTACH=full]113733[/ATTACH] </p><p>There&#039;s no damage to the cameo - the white dots are just lint or something!</p><p><br /></p><p>Below is the back:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]113734[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]113735[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]113736[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in