Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Ephemera and Photographs
>
2 Tintype Questions - Thanks!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="KingofThings, post: 47510, member: 468"]Those posters are good help and great to see anyway! Thanks!</p><p>The more I research the more I'm convinced she may not be US Navy but may be Royal Navy be it British, Canadian, Australian or New Zealand or... I've not researched other countries as are in Northwestern Europe, or elsewhere, but have seen things here and there which didn't spur me to go that way. Ireland has a navy but didn't this early and Scotland's disbanded in 1707. </p><p>The flattened or horizontal eagle is at issue as well as the badge's border. That there isn't a 'rate' between the eagle and the 2 down pointing chevrons doesn't help. The flattened chevrons are more certainly navy, or another sea service, than any other military service. I only find a flattened chevron like that on a women's left arm but later and British. It could be that women didn't have ratings at this time and were 'only' yeoman, or some similar service, and it wasn't required to note that with a rating badge. That she is almost certainly a 2nd class petty officer, as based on today's US Navy, Coast Guard, etc. and some other countries, is a good thing that this has been awarded to her as it would mean she's got her...umm...stuff together and been in service for some time... Unless this coat isn't hers as I guessed earlier though I hope I'm wrong. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":)" unselectable="on" /></p><p>At times rating and rank badges have changed arm displays but usually it was placed on the right arm earlier in time as is this photo. There isn't anything in the photo to ascertain that this negative wasn't flipped and that is her left arm not right. She could be one of the +- 5,500 WRNS (Women's Royal Navy Service) (also called: WRENS) which began in 1917. They were not without sacrifice with the first being lost serving aboard ship in 1918. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/frown.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":(" unselectable="on" /> This is where I lean the most but cannot find a single thing to pin that down to be certain...again...if it's her coat.</p><p>But...I will put this photo out to my connections and see what we see. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":)" unselectable="on" /> I really would like to solve or have this solved by someone else. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":)" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="KingofThings, post: 47510, member: 468"]Those posters are good help and great to see anyway! Thanks! The more I research the more I'm convinced she may not be US Navy but may be Royal Navy be it British, Canadian, Australian or New Zealand or... I've not researched other countries as are in Northwestern Europe, or elsewhere, but have seen things here and there which didn't spur me to go that way. Ireland has a navy but didn't this early and Scotland's disbanded in 1707. The flattened or horizontal eagle is at issue as well as the badge's border. That there isn't a 'rate' between the eagle and the 2 down pointing chevrons doesn't help. The flattened chevrons are more certainly navy, or another sea service, than any other military service. I only find a flattened chevron like that on a women's left arm but later and British. It could be that women didn't have ratings at this time and were 'only' yeoman, or some similar service, and it wasn't required to note that with a rating badge. That she is almost certainly a 2nd class petty officer, as based on today's US Navy, Coast Guard, etc. and some other countries, is a good thing that this has been awarded to her as it would mean she's got her...umm...stuff together and been in service for some time... Unless this coat isn't hers as I guessed earlier though I hope I'm wrong. :) At times rating and rank badges have changed arm displays but usually it was placed on the right arm earlier in time as is this photo. There isn't anything in the photo to ascertain that this negative wasn't flipped and that is her left arm not right. She could be one of the +- 5,500 WRNS (Women's Royal Navy Service) (also called: WRENS) which began in 1917. They were not without sacrifice with the first being lost serving aboard ship in 1918. :( This is where I lean the most but cannot find a single thing to pin that down to be certain...again...if it's her coat. But...I will put this photo out to my connections and see what we see. :) I really would like to solve or have this solved by someone else. :)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Ephemera and Photographs
>
2 Tintype Questions - Thanks!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...