Salt print question

Discussion in 'Ephemera and Photographs' started by Jerry Coker, Mar 31, 2021.

  1. Jerry Coker

    Jerry Coker Active Member

    Was wondering if anyone knows if salt prints were ever/often hand colored? I occasionally see enlarged hand colored portraits in bubble glass that resemble salt prints, w/ their kind of blurry patina. Just curious. Thank you.
     
  2. Roaring20s

    Roaring20s Well-Known Member

  3. 2manybooks

    2manybooks Well-Known Member

    The enlarged portraits you refer to are probably solar enlargements, which were very often retouched and hand colored. Salted paper (using Louis Désiré Blanquart-Evrard’s process) proved the most suitable paper from about 1860 to the early 1880s, when the more sensitive bromide papers became available. A variety of surface textures were possible in the bromide papers, but "the most popular surface for [solar enlarged] prints was the matt surface as it could be “worked up” or coloured".

    http://resources.culturalheritage.org/pmgtopics/2005-volume-eleven/11_14_Whitman.pdf
     
    Any Jewelry and Figtree3 like this.
  4. Jerry Coker

    Jerry Coker Active Member

    Thank you for the replies, and particularly the AIC link. Very interesting reading! So it appears that solar printing/enlargements required a preexisting negative, correct? I'm a little confused because I was reading about the Chicago Portrait Co. & it appears they required a customer to have a preexisting negative. Which would then require the customer have to get the negative from their local photography studio, before the photo could be enlarged using the solar enlargement process, I believe. I never realized that many of the framed bubble glass portraits that I see were actually enlargements of existing CDV's, Cabinets & other photos made from negatives!
     
    Figtree3 likes this.
  5. 2manybooks

    2manybooks Well-Known Member

    Yes, like most photographic printing processes, the light values are reversed with each iteration. So to get a positive print you first need a negative. If an original negative was not available, the photographer could photograph the positive image to be copied and work from that negative, but there would probably be a loss in quality each time that was done.
     
    Figtree3 likes this.
  6. Jerry Coker

    Jerry Coker Active Member

    Got it, thank you. It appears that the Chicago Portrait Co. (CPC) salesmen may have just been given a photo, by the client, then given the photo to the CPC solar printers, who then photographed, enlarged & colored. At least according to what I've read so far today about the CPC. It also appears the CPC was a bit shady. Also, taking a photo of a photo indeed might explain why many of the bubble glass photos I see appear blurry. Although that may just be the whole process, including the coloring. Anyway, thanks again for the info!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Threads: Salt print
Forum Title Date
Ephemera and Photographs Identifying Albumen vs Silver Gelatin Prints May 18, 2024
Ephemera and Photographs 1916 boudoir almanack art print May 7, 2024
Ephemera and Photographs Raoul Dufy Braun & Cie vintage print Jan 29, 2024
Ephemera and Photographs Cloth print of George washington Nov 25, 2022
Ephemera and Photographs Postcard: Bureau of Engraving and Printing Oct 20, 2022

Share This Page