Beautiful painting from 1951

Just bought it and i love it so much.

 

Hi,
I agree it is really nice, looks older than 1951 but that frame does not do for me. I would hang it in a minute but just not that frame. Did I say I love the painting?
greg

 

Nice find, Mango. I do agree with Greg that it's in a much older style than 1951 (both the image and the frame,) though. I don't see a date in your attachments. How do you know it's from then?

 

Could it be 1851?

 

Thanks for the replies.
The painting indeed looks older, but it's definitely from 1951. There's the date below the signature, though the frame hides it. The painter lived from 1893 to 1973.
The frame is older than the painting, i guess the painter (or someone else) re-used and older empty frame.

 

It's you !

 

Although old-fashioned the picture clearly looks like 1950s.

The frame is 1950s-60s, emulating an antique, but not really one, likely original to the painting.

 

I have seen many trees list...I have a couple of pines that list to the East

 

Mango - there is an option of posting the images right in your post so we don't have to click on thumbnails to see them.

 

I think the frame is detrimental to the painting. It's too florid for my taste.

 

You know, if you click on the title rather than the thumbnail, the picture opens in a new window.

 

Still gotta CLICK though......