Featured Art Deco gold ring yellow stone or diamond

Discussion in 'Jewelry' started by billyd3us, Oct 14, 2017.

  1. billyd3us

    billyd3us Thanks All my Friends

    Here is another piece I got today, has some writing but hard to make out the whole thing, maybe it was resized at one point. No gold karat markings anywhere but it is at least 10k, 18k acid fades the scratch a little so not sure.
    Anyone know what kind of stone this might be ? Needs a god cleaning.

    Thank You

    Billy D. 026.JPG 027.JPG 028.JPG 030.JPG 031.JPG 025.JPG
     
    Christmasjoy, Any Jewelry and judy like this.
  2. Bronwen

    Bronwen Well-Known Member

    One less than expert opinion on the stone: glass or amethyst treated to look like citrine. It is not uncommon to find older 10K rings, from when gold was not so phenomenally expensive, set with glass stones.
     
  3. billyd3us

    billyd3us Thanks All my Friends

    Okay, Thanks again Bronwen..
     
  4. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    Good thinking Bronwen. My first reaction was citrine, but glass is equally feasible.
     
    Christmasjoy and judy like this.
  5. Hollyblue

    Hollyblue Well-Known Member

    The stone could be almost any number of types quartz,topaz,beryl,sapphire,etc.
     
    Christmasjoy and judy like this.
  6. Bronwen

    Bronwen Well-Known Member

    Think we can plausibly rule out diamond & fancy sapphire on grounds of size alone; can't imagine such a stone going about incognito. Stone could probably use a cleaning, but think, even after, it would not have enough flash for chrysoberyl or topaz. Natural citrine actually rather rare & tends to be pale. Wrong shade for yellow tourmaline. Not much left to choose from among stones commonly used in jewelry.
     
    Christmasjoy, cxgirl and judy like this.
  7. Hollyblue

    Hollyblue Well-Known Member

    It's probably a "three bears stone",it needs to be cleaned and a well lighted photo.Not having "enough" flash is a matter of geometry and not the type of stone.
     
    Christmasjoy and judy like this.
  8. billyd3us

    billyd3us Thanks All my Friends

    I just cleaned it, here are some more pics. 055.JPG 056.JPG 058.JPG 059.JPG 057.JPG
     
  9. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    Nice ring, Billy.
    About the stone. There don't seem to be any bubbles, so probably not glass.
    No pleochroism (rules out topaz and some others). Shell-like fractures. My guess is citrine.

    Billy, do you know anyone with a diamond tester? It tests hardness on the Mohs scale, so other gemstones as well.

    The mark is intriguing, it looks like an old Middle Eastern mark. Not North African, those are in cartouches.
    I have some info on Middle Eastern gold marks, but can't find this one. Could be a maker's mark.
    If the ring was made in the Middle East, the stone is not treated. They didn't use treated amethysts there in those days.
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2017
    Christmasjoy and judy like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page