Acrylic ?

Discussion in 'Art' started by johnnycb09, Nov 20, 2015.

  1. johnnycb09

    johnnycb09 Well-Known Member

    This one I got kind of excited about. At first pass I just glanced at it,but the second pass I pulled it out and actually looked at it and it really intrigues me ! The frame itself looks like it could be from 39,and its signed 39,but the stuff written on the back confuses me? Any input is appreciated. DSCN3623.JPG DSCN3626.JPG
     
    KingofThings likes this.
  2. johnnycb09

    johnnycb09 Well-Known Member

    couple more... DSCN3617.JPG DSCN3630.JPG
     
    KingofThings likes this.
  3. verybrad

    verybrad Well-Known Member

    Good question. Everything but the frame suggests the later date to me.
     
    KingofThings likes this.
  4. johnnycb09

    johnnycb09 Well-Known Member

    Its very well matted,and it seems to be acrylic on paper ? Very faintly at the top was a former owners name who died in 2008,not that that means anything. I was wondering if MAYBE its a highway men work ?
     
    KingofThings likes this.
  5. Pat P

    Pat P Well-Known Member

    My assumption is it was painted in 1939 and framed in 2007.
     
  6. Mark London

    Mark London Well-Known Member

    Acrylic paints did not really hit the market until the late 1960's
     
  7. Pat P

    Pat P Well-Known Member

    But the person who wrote that on the back, presumably in 2007, may have been mistaken. Or can you tell from the photo that it really is acrylic?
     
  8. Mark London

    Mark London Well-Known Member

    The '39 could also refer to a date other than when the work was executed (eg. class of 1939).
     
  9. johnnycb09

    johnnycb09 Well-Known Member

    Unfortunately I don't know from acrylic so all I can say is some of the paint,like the sky,seemed almost chalky ? for lack of a better term. It didn't come off when I lightly touched it like a pastel would. And the grass across the bottom is almost scratched in looking ?
    Is this a better pic ? DSCN3620.JPG
     
  10. Pat P

    Pat P Well-Known Member

    Hmm, class of '39... could be.
     
  11. antidiem

    antidiem Well-Known Member

    Hi Johnny! Is it on canvas or paper?
     
  12. johnnycb09

    johnnycb09 Well-Known Member

    On paper,Antidiem. The matt is so well glued I was only able to pry apart the corner with the siggie,and Im afraid to try to separate it more.
     
  13. antidiem

    antidiem Well-Known Member

    I thought so, Johnny. It almost looks like a mono-print.
    To actually BE that in acrylic, it would have had to have been done very quickly (which it appears to have been with large brushstrokes and detail scratched into the paper afterwards). Just a thought, I cannot see it well enough to say for sure. Even if it started out as a mono-print, it may have been worked back into with paints. Does it have any sort of an "edge" around the sides that could have come from a print plate?
     
  14. johnnycb09

    johnnycb09 Well-Known Member

    No,its painted directly on paper.No edges that I can tell.
     
    antidiem likes this.
  15. Bdigger

    Bdigger Well-Known Member

    Not a highwaymen painting. No Highwaymen artists with the initials RA that I can find.
     
    johnnycb09 likes this.
  16. johnnycb09

    johnnycb09 Well-Known Member

    Thanks for looking Bdigger. I carefully pried the matt apart and took some pics,dammed if I know if its acrylic ! DSCN3646.JPG DSCN3649.JPG
     
  17. johnnycb09

    johnnycb09 Well-Known Member

  18. antidiem

    antidiem Well-Known Member

    If it began as a monoprint and then was covered with paint and scratched into, it could look like this. The back looks right for an oil based mono piece.
     
    johnnycb09 likes this.
  19. Bev aka thelmasstuff

    Bev aka thelmasstuff Colored pencil artist extraordinaire ;)

    Nothing about this says 1939 to me. The only thing I thought was the same as someone else - Class of '39 or born in '39. The style, the material, the colors all say 1960-70s
     
  20. LeftonGuy

    LeftonGuy Well-Known Member

    The bottom grass is intriguing. I am no art expert, but it almost looks like some type of a block or print was used to create that darker blue (or maybe grey) color of grass. The dark blue individual blades have a white border on each side that covers the colors underneath. The green blades do not. Not sure I am using the correct descriptive terms. I believe I also see this border on each side of the blades in other places, like between the yellow and blue trees/bushes. No doubt this art piece has a layered appearance. Also wonder if chalky feel due to use of mixed media?

    Now which did I do with those words - make it clear I am no art expert or provide evidence that I am an idiot?

    My 0 cents worth, the value of my opinions about art.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page