Featured Men's pinky Ring? unmarked

This has no stamp or markings, it might be like a size 8 or 9.. too big for any of my fingers....is it possible it's real gold just not marked?

 

i don't see it as a pinky ring...and the way the stones are set.....nice prongs....i think there's every chance it's real gold..... IMO !

 

yea, I got that feeling when I picked it up.. the white stones do not look like diamonds, too white.. but ruby looks real.. and prongs look good too

 

those were popular in the 70's......& it should be marked.........but 1st impression is it looks good..
can you get it tested.....for metal...and stones..?

 

yeah, I will this week sometime.. I was thinking it might have been "made" because the bottom row of stones aren't perfectly straight?

 

The metal would need testing.Looks like a low grade ruby and who knows what the white stones are. It could be a students practice ring,though I don't know why they would add prong settings to a ring made for channel setting.

 

and the last prong seems to come to far off the end of the plane because the red stone took up too much room.........
but hey !!!!

 

Well for $5.00 it peaked my interest enough to buy it.. lol

 

worth every penny of $5............so ...ya !!

 

Just my 2 cents since I am not a jooilie, but I knew a person (a man) who had a similar pinky ring, except all diamonds including that plain space.

 

I'm hoping it's a goodie!!

 

the stones just seem off to me..

 

Men's ring sizes are usually between 8 and 12 with 10 as the average on the ring finger.

 

The stones or the stone mountings? As I posted above the ring itself was made for channel set stones not prong.

 

Looks like a man's pinky ring to me too, maybe a man with the last name beginning with an "L"? No idea what the stones are, but the gold itself should be worth much more than five bucks! Let us know please!

 

Had it tested, not real gold... I sure thought it was.. darn it. lol