Vintage silver earring or not?

Discussion in 'Jewelry' started by Colinloves, Mar 15, 2022.

  1. Colinloves

    Colinloves New Member

    ear1.jpg ear2.jpg As Im no expert, I have no idea if this is modern or vintage.
    It just has the 925 mark - which I know, can suggest it was made before the 1920's, before hallmarks were standard, in England.

    I would really like a good firm date, as Im doing a local history of an area and looking at all the periods represented.

    Thank you :)......... more to follow ;)
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2022
    judy and KSW like this.
  2. KSW

    KSW Well-Known Member

    Welcome to the forum @Colinloves
    I am no expert but many modern items only have the 925 on them. This looks fairly recent to me but I’m sure someone will be along soon to confirm or not so I could be very wrong!
    I think the date marks and pictorial fineness marks are now optional so many items only have 925 on them.
    Please can you click ‘edit’ on your post and then go back to your photos and click ‘full image’ That will make them easier to look at.
     
    judy and Colinloves like this.
  3. KSW

    KSW Well-Known Member

    Here you go-
    Further changes to the legislation were made by the Hallmarking (Hallmarking Act Amendment) Regulations 1998 to bring the UK legislation in line with the rest of Europe.

    The main changes were:

    • Standards to be expressed as parts per thousand (millesimal) on all metals, eg Sterling silver to be marked 925, 18ct gold to be marked 750 etc…
    • Date letters are now optional
    • Pictorial fineness standard marks ie lion for silver, crown for gold, orb for platinum, now optional
    • Separate marks for imports abolished
    • New standards established for all metals
     
    Figtree3, judy and Colinloves like this.
  4. Bakersgma

    Bakersgma Well-Known Member

    Pretty earring Colinloves, but your statement about the 925 mark "which I know, can suggest it was made before the 1920's, before hallmarks were standard, in England." is incorrect. Where do you live?
     
    terry5732 and judy like this.
  5. Colinloves

    Colinloves New Member

    I was also thinking it was modern, but with a vintage design. As when it was recovered from the ground, it was as you now see it, and not tarnish.
     
    judy likes this.
  6. Bakersgma

    Bakersgma Well-Known Member

    The other thing to know is that not all jewelry was assayed (which was not cheap.)
     
    judy likes this.
  7. Colinloves

    Colinloves New Member

    I live in England, UK. I read in a few places that hallmarks were not standard before 1920. of course hallmarks were used before that time. its just that it wasnt a legal requirement.
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2022
    judy likes this.
  8. Barn Owl

    Barn Owl Well-Known Member

    It looks modern to me and resembles, in my mind, jewelry from Bali or India.
     
    reader, Figtree3, Colinloves and 3 others like this.
  9. stracci

    stracci Well-Known Member

    The style screams 1980s-90s.
    I had similar ones in amethyst back in the day.
    I agree with @Barn Owl, made in Bali, India or Thailand.
     
    reader, Figtree3, Colinloves and 5 others like this.
  10. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    ya, I'm seeing 80's also..
     
    stracci and judy like this.
  11. evelyb30

    evelyb30 Well-Known Member

    Later than that. I'm seeing 90s or later. Made in India probably, Bali or Thailand possibly, and sold all over.
     
    kyratango and stracci like this.
  12. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    It's pretty recent, and I'd agree on India or Bali or Indonesia.

    Hallmarks have been a legal requirement for centuries. However, this was often ignored.
     
  13. terry5732

    terry5732 Well-Known Member

    You heard wrong and now there is another line of this error online

    and now another
     
    BoudiccaJones and Ownedbybear like this.
  14. Colinloves

    Colinloves New Member

    "For a long time, particularly during the Georgian and Victorian eras, jewelry was often sold without proper hallmarking. In fact, hallmarking only became compulsory on all precious metals around the 1920s. As a result, the Assay Office carries a pre-1950s exemption from hallmarking. If a piece was manufactured before 1950 and bears no hallmark, it is exempt from the Assay Office's usual requirements."


    https://www.antiqueanimaljewelry.com/post/hallmarks-an-antique-jewelry-beginner-s-guide#:~:text=For a long time, particularly,pre-1950s exemption from hallmarking.

    You wanna go and tell them they are wrong too, Terry?
     
  15. Colinloves

    Colinloves New Member

    I was thinking the same. Not that I know anything. It was just a vibe.
     
  16. evelyb30

    evelyb30 Well-Known Member

    American jewelry, especially artisan, still isn't marked sometimes to this day.
     
    Colinloves and Ownedbybear like this.
  17. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    I'm in the UK. That link is arrant nonsense. It also copies images from the assay office but gets the facts wrong. Trading Standards laws require that precious metals be hallmarked, or described as yellow or white metal OR have been tested properly.
     
    BoudiccaJones, terry5732 and Figtree3 like this.
  18. KSW

    KSW Well-Known Member

    Good word that.
     
  19. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    I do like me a Word. ;)
     
    KSW likes this.
  20. KSW

    KSW Well-Known Member

    Since they were little, the girls have got used to ‘word of the day’
    If someone uses a good word they try to use it again that day. Sounds very Yummy Mummy ish but it’s not planned in any way shape or form and sometimes doesn’t happen for weeks.
    I knew I had succeeded other day when the 9year old used the word ‘piqued’ correctly in context. My work here is done :smug::hilarious:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page