15TH CENTURY ENGRAVED WOODBLOCK/CUT FOUND. NEED ADVICE!...

Discussion in 'Antique Discussion' started by HMAC, Nov 15, 2018.

  1. 2manybooks

    2manybooks Well-Known Member

    Last edited: Nov 19, 2018
  2. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    I think Madame , thou dost protest too much .... :playful::playful:

     
  3. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

  4. i need help

    i need help Moderator Moderator

    2ManyBooks and Aaron! You have just proven the world is not Flat! Rejoice and take a well deserved rest!
     
  5. moreotherstuff

    moreotherstuff Izorizent

    My initial enthusiasm is tempered. The image on those sites is much simpler than OP's engraving. I'd say a wood cut rather than a wood engraving. They are not from that plate. They may be copies; they may be indicative of some common source.

    It's certainly the same composition, and apparently the correct period. My guess is common source that was making the rounds at that time... maybe yet another engraving or chromolithograph illustrative of some highfalutin collection of paintings then recently published (conjecture).
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2018
  6. 2manybooks

    2manybooks Well-Known Member

    I wonder if the image on the clip-art sites is an exact reproduction of the version published in 1853, or if it is somewhat simplified for clip-art purposes. We need to locate an actual copy of the book. I checked to see if it is available on Gutenberg, but it is not.
     
  7. 2manybooks

    2manybooks Well-Known Member

  8. 2manybooks

    2manybooks Well-Known Member

  9. i need help

    i need help Moderator Moderator

    Christmasjoy and 2manybooks like this.
  10. aaroncab

    aaroncab in veritate victoria

    90 miles from Harrisonburg - might consider a day trip if I can think of another reason to go out there...
     
  11. 2manybooks

    2manybooks Well-Known Member

    Another problem in the comparison is that we can see details in the block that would not appear in a print produced from it. We can see the irregularities in the recessed areas, (some now gilt), that would not take ink and would not appear in the final print. So the block appears more complex.
    I do take your point that this is likely not a unique image, and there may have been other engravings derived from the same original image - wherever it is.
     
  12. HMAC

    HMAC Member

    I appreciate the effort & help from all of You on this board.
    Very very grateful indeed.....

    Have you noticed the words on top of the block that say page 29 faulte pagan?
    I would love to find out who did the wood engraving on that German bible. I actually found a actual print copy of the woodcut in a chest on paper. That is the reason the woodcut shows ink on it. I also tested the gilt part of the block and its at least 22k.
    FYI... This is the first time my Father bothered looking inside that chest since he purchased the house in 1979... He thought it was just an old bench...
     
  13. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    Is this the right volume?

    Oops. Let me go back and find it.

    Debora
     
    Christmasjoy likes this.
  14. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

  15. KikoBlueEyes

    KikoBlueEyes Well-Known Member

    Sorry. I live far away in Southern California.
     
    Christmasjoy and i need help like this.
  16. 2manybooks

    2manybooks Well-Known Member

  17. HMAC

    HMAC Member

    Here is the other block. why not! You have all been very very good & helpful. 18.jpg
     
  18. moreotherstuff

    moreotherstuff Izorizent

    It is possible. Those clip art images are much simpler than I would expect from a 19th C publication.

    As different as this is from the print under discussion, I think it may be the original source material:

    From a series of 12 etchings after Rembrandt called "Verscheyde Gedachten" (aka - "Plusieurs Pensées gravées d'après les desseins et les ésquisses originaux de Rembrandt; Par M. Pool. A Amsterdam. Sur le Leidse Graft.")
    by Mattys Pool, 1685-1730
    z.jpg

    https://www.britishmuseum.org/resea...object_details.aspx?objectId=3095613&partId=1

    And I think that might be based on this painting:

    Simeon in the Temple by Rembrandt, 1639 National gallery of Art Washington
    za.jpg

    https://www.theleidencollection.com/artwork/simeon-in-the-temple/

    Re-interpreted... misinterpreted... what have you, these are the images (not the only ones. but the most likely) I've found that show Simeon kneeling. I think that the suite has a French title is important as OP's engraved block was made in France and the title indicates that these etchings were available there.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2018
    Christmasjoy, cxgirl, komokwa and 2 others like this.
  19. 2manybooks

    2manybooks Well-Known Member

    Good possibilities. The passage in Luke that talks of Simeon does not specify that he knelt, so it is an artist's choice.
    For tracing the history of the specific block image, I guess we should consider that the OP's block was made for a French version copying the German - or vice versa? I guess we should look for a French "People's Pictorial Bible".
     
  20. i need help

    i need help Moderator Moderator

    @HMAC are there any notations on the back of the second block?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Threads: 15TH CENTURY
Forum Title Date
Antique Discussion 15th Century/Modern Wood Statue Question Oct 14, 2020
Antique Discussion 15th century sword sells for £30k, estimate was £200 Feb 10, 2020
Antique Discussion Next Saturday, June 15th, Unreserved Auction, Alfred, Maine.... Jun 6, 2019
Antique Discussion ARS in St. Louis, small 15th C. Buddha Feb 19, 2018
Antique Discussion 16th century Raeren?? Sep 12, 2024

Share This Page