Antique painting

So after all this is a high-quality lithography, not a painting?

So this is lithography))?
Well, if so, it costs about 30-50 dollars))

Well, now I will know what a good lithograph looks like)). So I'm not confused with painting))

 

To me it looks like an oleograph but only based by how thin the paper is and the shine from the image... that is why your friend thought it was a print. I like oleographs and have quite a few, they are very attractive compared to a "normal" print, and hard to tell from a distance if its an original painting, but yes if it is this it is worth a lot less than an original oil painting obviously.

 

Well, the picture is covered with a bright lacquer. Not the colors shine, but the varnish. Pictures also wrote on paper.

 

My brother looked at the painting (he studied for an artist for a long time), he said that maybe this painting, sees strokes in the picture.

But I do not know. what to think))

What does the inscription mean?

this is the signature of the lithogarph? So this is lithography?

 

I can see the word Druck which translates as 'pressure' so I would conclude some sort of pressed print. Sorry I can't make out the rest of the wording.

 

I don't know if this helps. To me it looks like RLAC?DRUCK? GUSTAV W. SEITZ, WANDSBECK

 

GREAT job SIS!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Google-ing "GUSTAV W. SEITZ, WANDSBECK" comes up with someone else who has a lithograph, the text there is the factory who printed it perhaps, but I'm confused now, I thought this artist was "Friedrich Heimerdinger" not "Gustav W. Seitz"?

 

It's Heimerdinger who painted the original oil painting and Seitz who manufactured the print you have.