Real Qing Dynasty Buddha Cloisonne?

Discussion in 'Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain' started by Evanreykjavik, Nov 3, 2017.

  1. Evanreykjavik

    Evanreykjavik New Member

    I recently acquired this Buddha statute. It probably weighs in at about 3-5 pounds. Unsure if it is (i) fake - meaning recent replica (ii) brass, bronze or copper. Anyone have any leaning as to whether they think it is genuine or not? I'm not expecting anyone to know 100% either way, but just looking for your thoughts.

    I was able to get a peek at the inside and took some pics if that helps. I did a ding test to see if it "sounds" copper, but having no experience in it, I can't really say for sure one way or another.

    Thoughts?

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/fM8Wa1hcdyE2Ii682
     
  2. dgbjwc

    dgbjwc Well-Known Member

    Hello Evanreykjavik and welcome to the board! I am far from an expert in dating buddha statues but I believe the material may be what is called pot metal:

    Borrowed from Google: Pot metal—also known as monkey metal, white metal, or die-cast zinc—is a colloquial term that refers to alloys of low-melting point metals that manufacturers use to make fast, inexpensive castings.

    Pot metal items started pouring into the US beginning around the depression era and continues even today. I've been in some gift shops that really offer nothing but contemporary Buddha statues, incense, and jewelry from Asia. Many of these modern items are quite heavy. I've sold several older (circa 1930's) pot metal Buddhas that functioned as incense burners and they've always sold well for me. I could tell they were relatively older by the wear. The items I sold were also lighter in weight.

    I wouldn't call this a fake or a replica. A fake is meant to deceive and I don't think that was the case here. More likely just someone's interpretation of a religious figure.

    Hopefully others will be along who are more versed in this area and can help you better than I can.
    Don
     
    komokwa likes this.
  3. Evanreykjavik

    Evanreykjavik New Member


    Thank you so much for your reply. So then the question is, did they use or have access to "pot metal" during the Qing dynasty (which ended roughly 1912)? If they did have access to it and use it, then I guess its technically possible that this is actually a Qing cloissone. However, if pot metal wasn't introduced to China until the 30's+, then it by definition is a misrepresentation (not fake, since as you stated, no one is saying this is something that it is not - but more like misrepresenting the date it is from).
     
  4. dgbjwc

    dgbjwc Well-Known Member

    Keep in mind I could be wrong about the metal. I'm just going by a photo. Personally, it always helps if I can handle metal objects. Are those white areas on the outstretched arm repairs?
    Don
     
    judy likes this.
  5. Evanreykjavik

    Evanreykjavik New Member

    Good question. I have no clue. I have no experience in this. It simply caught my eye and I liked it so I bought it. It was not an attempt to make money or even worry about getting ripped off - just an impulse buy of something I liked. The white probably is an attempt to fix - or someone in a factory 5 years ago has a job where all he does is break off noses and then fixes them to make them look more aged. No clue. It could also be that those crevices collect moisture so perhaps its corrosion and not a glue of any kind? I don't know!
     
    dgbjwc likes this.
  6. DragonflyWink

    DragonflyWink Well-Known Member

    This looks to me like one of the somewhat carelessly done cloisonne Buddhas coming out of Tibet, might be bronze...

    ~Cheryl
     
    judy, Any Jewelry and dgbjwc like this.
  7. dgbjwc

    dgbjwc Well-Known Member

    That would explain the weight.
    Don
     
  8. evelyb30

    evelyb30 Well-Known Member

    That sort of enamel might not stick to pot metal. I generally see it on brass, at least on the export bits we see here.
     
    judy and Any Jewelry like this.
  9. Evanreykjavik

    Evanreykjavik New Member

    (sorry for the double reply if it appears, not sure what happened there)

    So if this is brass then that lends some credence to the possibility that this was made during the Qing period. Although declining in quality, these were made mostly in brass until after the Qing when it switched over to copper.

    Or I'm just suffering from confirmation bias ;)
     
    judy and Any Jewelry like this.
  10. DragonflyWink

    DragonflyWink Well-Known Member

  11. Evanreykjavik

    Evanreykjavik New Member

    I agree, thank you!!!
     
    judy likes this.
  12. Evanreykjavik

    Evanreykjavik New Member

    Well this ended well. The auction house is willing to offer a full refund (granted, I will believe it when I see it - but still). I still really like it, but can probably find them on ebay for a quarter the price especially if it's not "Qing" as they claimed.
     
  13. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    way to stand up for yourself.....and not be taken advantage of !! :)
     
    judy likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Threads: Real Qing
Forum Title Date
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain Real deal? Qing Yung Cheng (Yong Zheng) bowl Jun 25, 2024
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain Real Jiaqing? Feb 3, 2019
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain Real chinese painting with kpm mark Aug 9, 2024
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain Help find out if the tiles are really imported from Italy or if they were made in Yugoslavia Aug 8, 2024
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain Is this a real copeland piece or fake if real how old? Marked Copyright Reserved Copeland Jul 14, 2024

Share This Page