Featured silver pendant

Discussion in 'Jewelry' started by Matt Johnson, Sep 28, 2020.

  1. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    Just like the other one, this did too belong to my grandma. A silver pendant with a 800 mark. 1930s? Any information would be helpful!

    20200928_214941.jpg
     
    lovewrens, KSW and Any Jewelry like this.
  2. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

  3. Hollyblue

    Hollyblue Well-Known Member

    Telling us it was your grandmothers doesn't help with a time line reference.The piece could have been purchased years after it was produced.
     
  4. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    I thought the style in whitch it was made would speak for itself. I know nothing about this piece
     
    KSW likes this.
  5. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    Hey Matt.....
    is it a quarter inch wide...or 3 inches wide ???

    You know stuff we don't know....but require , for any meaningful ....critical ...look at what you present..

    Your pics are fine....and your thoughts are most welcomed.....but we need to know everything you already know....even if u think , something speaks for itself....you speak better !!! :):):):)

    Looks like a charm bracelet charm....the bale area is pretty knocked around............
     
    kyratango likes this.
  6. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    maybe someone will know the mark after the 800....???
     
  7. Hollyblue

    Hollyblue Well-Known Member

    The bale looks like it was repaired,solder where it shouldn't be.
     
  8. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    it's about 0.7 inches, almost 2 centimeters. The bail has 2 more marks but I can't read them, they are too worn out ://
     
    KSW and komokwa like this.
  9. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    Charming pendant, Matt.
    Spot on. The mark next to 800 is a Laurin mark. It was only used by Pforzheim (Germany) makers between 1934 and 1938. The use of the Laurin mark was granted to select makers of 'middle quality' jewellery. It was abandoned after protests from silversmiths from other towns, who said it suggested that only Pforzheim made good quality jewelry.
     
    patd8643, stracci, KSW and 2 others like this.
  10. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    Thanks
    I can always learn something from you!
     
    KSW, komokwa and Any Jewelry like this.
  11. DragonflyWink

    DragonflyWink Well-Known Member

    The mark is a bit unclear, but don't believe it is a Laurin mark, and suspect the pendant is earlier than the '30s. To my eye it appears to be a variant of Pforzheim maker Lutz & Weiss' mark - not a lot of time right now, but a quick search found this nice Jugendstil pendant attributed to them, bearing a similar mark that also includes the reichsmark, their image is also unclear, but I think worth looking at...


    https://www.antiques-atlas.com/antique/jugendstil_silver_pendant_by_lutz__weiss/ac058a1454
    lutzweissmark-jugendstilpendant.JPG


    ~Cheryl
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2020
  12. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    I'm not seeing what you see Dragon.............:(:confused::wideyed::wideyed:
     
    Any Jewelry likes this.
  13. KSW

    KSW Well-Known Member

    She is so pretty!. Very elegant lady. I wonder if she was a person or an artists interpretation?. Either way for me it would be a keeper.
     
    Matt Johnson likes this.
  14. DragonflyWink

    DragonflyWink Well-Known Member


    Eh, my eyes are pretty bad anymore, but what I see is a fancy script 'L' conjoined with a simple, wide 'W' - Lutz & Weiss used a similar mark in a shield, with numerous variations, have seen that mark without shield on a few jewelry pieces, attributed to L&W. Below is a comparison of a typical L&W mark, the OP's mark, which appears to be a bit rubbed, and the really crummy pic of what looks to me like a similar mark attributed to L&W:


    lutzweissmark-comparison-a.jpg


    This is the 1930s Laurin mark (Ln), it is different, and I just don't see it on the OP's piece:

    laurinmark-ad-2b-1.jpg
    laurinmark-1-a.jpg

    laurinmark-2-a.jpg


    ~Cheryl
     
  15. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    I think you are right, I'll go and try to take a better picture brb
    How old is it then in your opinion?
     
  16. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    received_951669385325579.jpeg
    received_3755219197839865.jpeg
    Here the other two but they are pretty blurry ://

    received_342633297048150.jpeg
    received_253093576058908.jpeg
     
    DragonflyWink likes this.
  17. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    I'm seeing the L W now........thanks Dragon !
     
    DragonflyWink and Matt Johnson like this.
  18. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    Yup, same
     
    DragonflyWink and komokwa like this.
  19. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    Found a few similar ones on google, as it appears they have been popular during the Jugendstil period so around 1900. Thank you very much for your help!
     
    DragonflyWink and komokwa like this.
  20. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    Matt, that black and white picture did the job! It is indeed LW, as Cheryl said.
    It is certainly the style, which is why I was a bit surprised to see a Laurin mark. Turns out it wasn't.;)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page