c. 1905 gold cufflinks, ?Cartier?

Discussion in 'Jewelry' started by Mike H-S, Oct 10, 2016.

  1. Mike H-S

    Mike H-S New Member

    Hello,

    My grandfather passed away a few years ago and left me a pair of gold cufflinks which I wear a lot. It's only recently occurred to me that I should probably specify them on my house insurance, but I need to figure out what they are first - I think I've narrowed the marks to a 1905 Sheffield assay, but I cannot find the maker's mark anywhere. My grandfather always said they were Cartier, but while the mark is similar it isn't quite right - It's J.G in an eye shape rather than J.C in an oblong. Is anybody able to help me to figure it out?

    Thanks very much.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    It's feasible they were retailed by Cartier, but not made by them. I can't see that mark on the obvious sites - I'd suggest contacting the Sheffield assay office. Hoever, I ssuspect the main value is in the gold.
     
  3. Ladybranch

    Ladybranch Well-Known Member

    Welcome to the forums!

    I'm not up on British gold hallmarking, but suspect it is similar to their silver hallmarks. That 1st mark/punch is a leopard/lioin head meaning the assay office was in London rather than Sheffield. The 2nd mark looks like an "H" in a square punch with clipped corners. With London being the city of assay, this "H" is probably the date letter for 1943. The 3rd punch is a crown. This crown is probably what made you think Sheffield. A crown is the **silver** assay mark for Sheffield. This crown along with the 4th punch of "18" denotes are the finesse/purity for 18 carat in England.

    Scroll down to page 11 "Historic UK Hallmarks prior to 1975" to see the gold assay marks and the crown with 18 marks:
    http://webarchive.nationalarchives....ingcouncil.gov.uk/publications/hallmarks2.pdf

    Now as to the marker's mark of "JG" in an oval it may??? be for J. Gilmore? A mark like this with a dot after the J. was registered by him in 1938. 1938 is in the right time frame for a 1943 date of assay.
    http://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Makers/London-JG-JK.html#JG

    Please wait for others to chime to see if they agree with the above!!!

    --- Susan
     
    afantiques, komokwa and bobsyouruncle like this.
  4. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    Susan, you're spot on. I'd missed the damn leopard head!
     
    komokwa likes this.
  5. Ladybranch

    Ladybranch Well-Known Member

    OBB, what are you doing up?? Get thee to bed so you will be bright-eyed and bushy-tailed tomorrow or rather to do the USA's night shift for us Yankees!

    --- Susan
     
    yourturntoloveit likes this.
  6. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    It's my afternoon still. ;)
     
    komokwa likes this.
  7. Ladybranch

    Ladybranch Well-Known Member

    Duh... dumb me. :wacky: I guess I'm the one that needs to go [back] to bed. I don't know what I was thinking. As it was 7 something my time, I added 6 and came up with 1 something for London. The AM/PM just didn't sink in because I hadn't had my 2nd cup of tea.

    --- Susan
     
    yourturntoloveit and gregsglass like this.
  8. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    try coffee.....it'll open yer eyes...:hilarious::hilarious:
     
    Ladybranch likes this.
  9. Mike H-S

    Mike H-S New Member

    Interesting! The leopard's head I did striggle to see because it's so small and worn. The "h" definitely looks like a Gothic "k" under a magnifier though.
     
  10. Ladybranch

    Ladybranch Well-Known Member

    Hmmmm.... a gothic "k" in that shape punch would have to be 1966. To these old eyes I'm not sure if a K, k, or H; however, in that shape punch it would have to be for the 1940s through to the 1960s. Here's the best I can do in editing that mark. London date codes up and pass the 1960s can be see on p. 12 of the first link I posted in my first message, reply #3 of this thread.

    --- Susan

    IMG_2501.JPG IMG_2502.JPG
     
    yourturntoloveit and Mike H-S like this.
  11. Mike H-S

    Mike H-S New Member

    Those marks are it to a tee!
     
    yourturntoloveit likes this.
  12. afantiques

    afantiques Well-Known Member

    It is 1925, lower case gothic K.

    It's also a far more likely time for that type of gold cufflink.

    It has nothing to do with Cartier, they would have their own makers for that sort of bijouterie, and probably in a more French style.

    Gold cufflinks have enjoyed a bit of a resurgence in interest so they'd fetch more than the gold value by a reasonable margin.
     
    Mike H-S likes this.
  13. Mike H-S

    Mike H-S New Member

    Good to know, but I don't plan to sell them; I like to keep family things that connect to the past - I also own my great-grandfather's China War medal for the Relief of Pekin during the Boxer Rebellion, and all of his personal papers - Including personal correspondence from Beatty, who was his Commander when he won his medal, and who later became First Sealord, the First Earl Beatty (he took the surrender of the German navy at the end of WW2 and is one of the other two statues in Trafalgar Square). My great grandfather was the Admiral's Messman for most of his career (I have all of his service records). Money's nice, but it don't beat roots!

    Link to pictures in case historical documents, medals and militaria are of interest to anybody: https://m.facebook.com/michael.hawkes.31/albums/402034243254970/

    Me I just like to own a bit of my family history.
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2016
    anundverkaufen likes this.
  14. Ladybranch

    Ladybranch Well-Known Member

    af, I agree it certainly looks like the Gothic K for 1925 and a more likely time for it, but the shape of the punch doesn't, at least not for me. The punch doesn't have that serpentine bottom edge. Were shape of punches for gold different than those for silver?

    --- Susan
     
    yourturntoloveit likes this.
  15. Mike H-S

    Mike H-S New Member

    This was the source of my confusion too. The letter is absolutely right but the shape of the punch is wrong. The only thing I could think of was the town of assay mark being so worn it might not be London. Glasgow maybe?
     
  16. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    It isn't unusual for the cartouche shape to be slightly wrong, but the letter correct. Go by the letter. A Glasgow mark would have a thistle too, anyhow.
     
  17. Mike H-S

    Mike H-S New Member

    ...And having said I wouldn't sell them my car has just just sharted its clutch out all over the road so it's off to ebay I go :,(
     
  18. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    Sharted.....I'm unfamiliar with this term....
     
  19. Mansons2005

    Mansons2005 Nasty by Nature, Curmudgeon by Choice


    Ah. Mayhap thee doth not consume many breakfast burritos..........................
     
  20. Mike H-S

    Mike H-S New Member

    Clearly you don't frequent my local restaurants.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Threads: 1905 gold
Forum Title Date
Jewelry Italian ''gold'' necklace Nov 9, 2024
Jewelry Gold-tone flower rhinestone brooch with odd hook on the back. Nov 5, 2024
Jewelry Help with identifying gold markings Oct 21, 2024
Jewelry How old is this brooch? testing as gold and garnet Oct 14, 2024
Jewelry Small round pin gold-plated? with white scarabs. Sep 25, 2024

Share This Page