Featured Short wedding dress from the 1920s? What is missing from the outfit?

Discussion in 'Textiles, Needle Arts, Clothing' started by Elen Beattie, Jun 8, 2024.

  1. Elen Beattie

    Elen Beattie Well-Known Member

    Hello all! I don't usually pick up vintage or antique clothing because it's not really in my wheelhouse but sometimes items are too good to pass up at the auction (I have a few more pieces coming soon that I will share)! This was a lot of various items with a photograph included. I want to confirm that the short dress is indeed a wedding dress and if there likely would have been a slip of some kind underneath? It's a little difficult to make out the details in the photograph, and I'm trying to see if there is anything missing. The lot also came with headdress, various floral button hole posies, silk stockings and some satin ribbons. Thanks for any info :)
    438137402_815002403568398_6150418720407082101_n.jpg 438154582_867365121865713_3360043966644167679_n.jpg 438125151_973785594192314_5372039304762148344_n.jpg 438112437_823658536494623_8119459360350964981_n.jpg 438124877_991762268793564_2913376114671024916_n.jpg 438115878_1673056663518639_4851055368419451908_n.jpg 438154299_1386976018659347_4420544161033292770_n.jpg
     
  2. pearlsnblume

    pearlsnblume Well-Known Member

    That is lovely. IMHO, I would think there would have been some sort of layer underneath so it was not see thru-- slip or sheath.. I am not a clothes expert, so wait for those with precise knowledge.
     
    Marko, Figtree3, johnnycb09 and 3 others like this.
  3. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    Yes, it would have had a slip underneath. And it appears to be missing the sash which would emphasis the below-the-waist silhouette of the late 1920s. (It's visible in the photograph.)

    Debora
     
    Figtree3, johnnycb09, Bronwen and 2 others like this.
  4. Elen Beattie

    Elen Beattie Well-Known Member

    Ah ok thank you! There is actually something that looks like a sash with it, I wasn't sure if it was part of this outfit or not. I will post a pic!
     
    johnnycb09, Bronwen and pearlsnblume like this.
  5. Elen Beattie

    Elen Beattie Well-Known Member

    This looks to be silk. The other is a black ribbon also with the lot but unsure if associated with any of the wedding party or not!
    438102145_1415743989092117_5199169311432017422_n.jpg 438137489_1384997056222607_109506215637547788_n.jpg 438102155_326403710498976_5918517671481222178_n.jpg
     
  6. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    An inexpensive wedding dress. Appears to be manufactured not hand-sewn. Are you sure the sash isn't rayon? Would have been called "artificial silk" in the 1920s. Humble people but respectable. Bride's side a bit more prosperous than groom's (although aren't he and his brothers good-looking!) Women, including those older, have bobbed hair and knee-length skirts so up-to-date with fashion. A small wedding party given the size of the cake. From the wax flowers, I suspect they were someone off-the-beaten track where flowers weren't plentiful in the summer months.

    Debora
     
  7. Elen Beattie

    Elen Beattie Well-Known Member

    Wonderful information thank you! The sash feels like silk but I'm definitely not an expert so could well be rayon.
     
    Bronwen and pearlsnblume like this.
  8. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    In what part of the world was the auction held?

    Debora
     
    Figtree3, Bronwen and pearlsnblume like this.
  9. pearlsnblume

    pearlsnblume Well-Known Member

    As an aside, I am wondering if the bride's bouquet was just in stock from the photographer in your photo.

    When my grandmother was still alive, I asked her how she was able to afford such a large floral bouquet fpr her wedding shot. I saw her wedding photo. She told me the photographer kept some florals in his shop and it was part of the set up. They were faux flowers. It was huge bouquet she held and she was very petite.
     
  10. Elen Beattie

    Elen Beattie Well-Known Member

    I'm in Alberta, Canada. The auction was in Saskatchewan.
     
    Figtree3, Bronwen and pearlsnblume like this.
  11. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    That explains the ferns.

    Debora
     
    johnnycb09, Bronwen and Elen Beattie like this.
  12. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    One thing interesting about the photo is it wasn't taken in a studio. It was taken outdoors and not even in a garden. Appears just to be a yard. With a folding table, covered by an inexpensive hand-worked tablecloth, set up outside to hold the cake.

    Debora

    Screenshot 2024-06-08 at 10.47.56 AM.jpeg
     
  13. evelyb30

    evelyb30 Well-Known Member

    Those are wax orange blossoms. They were standard in the early 20s; my grandother's veil from 1921 had the same flowers. Orange blossoms smell great but they're perishable as all heck and very seasonal. Queen Victoria wore them, so they became the standard. Since most brides didn't have a hothouse or orange grove, they used wax flowers. The cool part is you have the groom's boutonniere too!
     
  14. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    Go Oilers !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  15. Elen Beattie

    Elen Beattie Well-Known Member

    Haha oh yes, Alberta is very excited atm :woot:
     
    pearlsnblume and komokwa like this.
  16. Elen Beattie

    Elen Beattie Well-Known Member

    Thanks all for your info and insight! I feel like I'm in a bit of a quandary now because I buy most of these auction items to resell but I'm a little compelled to keep these. I find it a bit sad that they didn't stay in their original family's possession.
     
  17. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    I agree. Someone's mother. But daughter may have died without descendants. Families who homesteaded on prairie, I would imagine. Auction house provided no further details about provenance?

    Debora
     
  18. Elen Beattie

    Elen Beattie Well-Known Member

    No, nothing. It was just a general vintage clothing lot with poor pictures and no real detail. The photograph is actually a modern one that appears to have be printed as a version of the original so no handwritten notes on the back or anything.
     
    Figtree3, pearlsnblume and komokwa like this.
  19. pearlsnblume

    pearlsnblume Well-Known Member

    I know that tv shows and movies love to buy vintage or antique clorhing. You might want to put it up for a low amount and let the bidders decide what it is worth.
    That is if you don't have that much invested and want to take a risk.
    List with measurements and sell AS IS,

    Just a thought
     
    komokwa and Elen Beattie like this.
  20. Figtree3

    Figtree3 What would you do if you weren't afraid?

    I was wondering about that.

    Debora did a great assessment of all of this. It appears there was a plain backdrop set up behind the wedding party. Behind the bride's head there appears to be a gap between two pieces of cloth.
     
    pearlsnblume and Elen Beattie like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Threads: Short wedding
Forum Title Date
Textiles, Needle Arts, Clothing Wedding dress 1938 Oct 20, 2021
Textiles, Needle Arts, Clothing Double wedding ring quilt parital piece, extra special construction Aug 19, 2019
Textiles, Needle Arts, Clothing VTG Italian wedding bedspread... what era? Mar 30, 2019
Textiles, Needle Arts, Clothing Hand sewn satin Wedding dress 1950s Jun 12, 2018
Textiles, Needle Arts, Clothing Edwardian wedding dress Feb 13, 2018

Share This Page